Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hernan Castro-Rueda

Rheumatology Mission Viejo, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1720162092 CMS profile 123171

26800 Crown Valley Pkwy, Suite 330, Mission Viejo, CA 92691

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,975

1,067 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,184 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Hernan Castro-Rueda of Mission Viejo, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,975 across 1,067 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,184 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,721 198
2024 General $4,445 182
2023 General $3,059 134
2022 General $3,658 183
2021 General $1,075 72
2020 General $837 53
2019 General $4,179 245

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hernan Castro-Rueda
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hernan Castro-Rueda were reported at $4,721. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Hernan Castro-Rueda Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,179 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $837 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,075 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,658 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,059 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $4,445 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $4,721 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,086 178 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,697 217 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,865 94 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,854 92 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,322 61 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,261 41 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,202 50 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $985 62 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $587 31 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $527 16 payments
  11. Other $4,590 225 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,534 1,060 payments
  2. Education $391 6 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $50 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,693 114 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,489 70 payments
  3. TALTZ $1,230 39 payments
  4. Otezla $1,212 96 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $1,179 49 payments
  6. Cimzia $1,122 52 payments
  7. XELJANZ $874 49 payments
  8. Enbrel $822 57 payments
  9. COSENTYX Immunology $794 44 payments
  10. COSENTYX Dermatology $718 33 payments
  11. Other $11,930 612 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

2,200

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$602,847

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

15.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 18 $199,723
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 33 $195,893
Otezla Apremilast Brand 19 $84,281
Remicade Infliximab Brand 15 $69,432
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 578 $24,354
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 218 $6,424
Colchicine Generic 35 $2,801
Prednisone Generic 322 $2,077
Celecoxib Generic 80 $1,993
Allopurinol Generic 211 $1,912

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$105,873

Of which drugs: $7,670

Medicare patients

368

Average age 76

Services billed

2,654

242 women, 126 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 69%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Osteoporosis 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 21%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 32 1,450 $145

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$767 — —
TREMFYA
$346 — —
BENLYSTA
$288 — —
Cimzia
$269 — —
TALTZ
$247 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,067 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record