Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Heather Pulaski

Gynecologic Oncology Tyler, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1033230354 CMS profile 47164

501 Saunders Ave Ste 310, Tyler, TX 75702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$74,750

168 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,459,960 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Heather Pulaski of Tyler, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $74,750 across 168 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,459,960 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Gynecologic Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $24,669 63
2024 General $25,262 48
2023 General $14,488 30
2022 General $707 14
2021 General $9,484 11
2019 General $139 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Heather Pulaski
  • Gynecologic Oncology median
  • Middle half of Gynecologic Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Heather Pulaski were reported at $24,669. Among 1,179 Gynecologic Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $305 and the middle half received between $111 and $1,499.

Show as a table
Year Heather Pulaski Gynecologic Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $139 $287 $113–$1,548 $163
2020 $0 $223 $59–$2,164 $114
2021 $9,484 $193 $68–$1,139 $132
2022 $707 $252 $90–$1,151 $149
2023 $14,488 $281 $102–$1,419 $160
2024 $25,262 $308 $108–$1,502 $164
2025 $24,669 $305 $111–$1,499 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $60,449 57 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $11,441 30 payments
  3. Tempus AI, Inc $497 11 payments
  4. Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc. $323 4 payments
  5. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $228 2 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $202 9 payments
  7. Genmab U.S., Inc. $159 7 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $143 3 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $134 1 payment
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $131 5 payments
  11. Other $1,040 39 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $56,850 18 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $8,616 9 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $5,379 137 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,885 3 payments
  5. Education $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JEMPERLI $37,466 43 payments
  2. ZEJULA $23,323 34 payments
  3. LYNPARZA $11,094 15 payments
  4. XT CDX $497 11 payments
  5. Da Vinci Surgical System $228 2 payments
  6. LIBTAYO $166 7 payments
  7. TIVDAK $159 7 payments
  8. Veozah $143 3 payments
  9. Pomalyst $134 1 payment
  10. IMJUDO $131 6 payments
  11. Other $2,189 75 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

631

Median for Gynecological Oncology: 95

Drug cost

$21,578

Median for Gynecological Oncology: $4,719

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Gynecological Oncology: 19.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 14 $8,295
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 12 $4,882
Megestrol Acetate Generic 24 $1,746
Anastrozole Generic 39 $784
Estradiol Generic 15 $700
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 52 $651
Gabapentin Generic 65 $635
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 13 $531
Olanzapine Generic 45 $425
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Lidocaine/Prilocaine Brand 31 $376

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 860 Part D prescribers listed as Gynecological Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 82 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$93,501

Of which drugs: $19,218

Medicare patients

133

Average age 72

Services billed

2,877

133 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 60%
Arthritis 38%
Depression 34%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 11 1,017 $107

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JEMPERLI
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $19,240
$19,240 — —
ZEJULA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $4,969
$4,969 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $124
$124 — —
TIVDAK
  • Genmab U.S., Inc. $76
$76 — —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $72
$72 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

168 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Gynecologic Oncology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record