Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Harjot Bhandal

Interventional Pain Medicine Santa Rosa, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1245611250 CMS profile 8454815

220 Concourse Blvd, Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$81,930

394 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$662

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$14,000 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2023

Through program year 2025, Harjot Bhandal of Santa Rosa, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $81,930 across 394 general payments and $662 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $14,000 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $22,155 98
2024 General $26,777 102
2023 General $25,504 99
2022 General $4,671 52
2021 General $684 19
2021 Research $597 5
2020 General $2,139 24
2020 Research $65 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Harjot Bhandal
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Harjot Bhandal were reported at $22,155. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Harjot Bhandal Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $2,139 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $684 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $4,671 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $25,504 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $26,777 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $22,155 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $41,227 81 payments
  2. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $18,119 55 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $9,649 101 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $5,717 64 payments
  5. Painteq LLC $2,190 26 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $1,549 16 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $905 12 payments
  8. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $847 10 payments
  9. Bioventus LLC $272 3 payments
  10. Vertos Medical, Inc. $256 4 payments
  11. Other $1,199 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $32,995 11 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $19,336 308 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $15,541 67 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $11,855 4 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,875 3 payments
  6. Education $329 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Evoke $20,804 41 payments
  2. Evoke SCS $20,423 40 payments
  3. Prospera Not Applicable $16,026 37 payments
  4. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $4,102 24 payments
  5. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $3,430 36 payments
  6. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $3,349 23 payments
  7. PAINTEQ $2,190 26 payments
  8. Prospera Not Applicable $1,991 13 payments
  9. SYNCHROMEDII $1,511 16 payments
  10. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $1,262 13 payments
  11. Other $7,138 133 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $662 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

3,814

Median for Anesthesiology: 322

Drug cost

$75,888

Median for Anesthesiology: $8,738

Branded share of claims

27.7%

Median for Anesthesiology: 25.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 657 $16,978
Horizant Gabapentin Enacarbil Brand 11 $14,112
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 271 $5,766
Pregabalin Generic 307 $5,271
Gabapentin Generic 465 $4,897
Lidocaine Generic 37 $3,344
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 315 $3,174
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 234 $2,586
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 143 $2,194
Baclofen Generic 134 $2,142

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,517 Part D prescribers listed as Anesthesiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 93 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$638,305

Of which drugs: $4,039

Medicare patients

602

Average age 72

Services billed

12,737

384 women, 218 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 29%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
COPD 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 224 1,804 $1,375
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 174 2,614 $236

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

400 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record