Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Lee

Interventional Pain Medicine Yorba Linda, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1558523928 CMS profile 720917

16611 Yorba Linda Blvd, Yorba Linda, CA 92886

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$257,045

568 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,979 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2021

Through program year 2025, David Lee of Yorba Linda, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $257,045 across 568 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,979 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $66,202 111
2024 General $52,967 144
2023 General $40,317 122
2022 General $46,788 95
2021 General $43,563 62
2020 General $6,646 25
2019 General $563 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Lee
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Lee were reported at $66,202. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year David Lee Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $563 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $6,646 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $43,563 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $46,788 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $40,317 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $52,967 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $66,202 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $99,839 296 payments
  2. MML US, Inc. $71,650 56 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $56,335 125 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $13,030 26 payments
  5. Vertos Medical, Inc. $6,378 7 payments
  6. Nalu Medical, Inc. $3,748 4 payments
  7. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $2,000 2 payments
  8. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $1,317 10 payments
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $1,046 7 payments
  10. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $452 11 payments
  11. Other $1,251 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $115,371 85 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $67,700 48 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $35,425 21 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $19,448 349 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $13,339 57 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $5,762 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ReActiv8 $71,650 56 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $45,827 126 payments
  3. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $31,656 61 payments
  4. Proclaim DRG IPG $12,419 7 payments
  5. IonicRF Generator $12,367 13 payments
  6. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $9,656 9 payments
  7. Intracept $8,500 15 payments
  8. General - Therapies $6,789 12 payments
  9. mild Device Kit $6,378 7 payments
  10. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $5,762 8 payments
  11. Other $30,374 259 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

1,854

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 276

Drug cost

$50,138

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $5,921

Branded share of claims

24%

Median for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: 11.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 310 $9,743
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 129 $9,208
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 11 $4,462
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 140 $4,432
Gabapentin Generic 345 $3,469
Pregabalin Generic 82 $2,853
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 100 $2,657
Fentanyl Generic 19 $1,886
Lidocaine Generic 20 $1,570
Celecoxib Generic 51 $1,388

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,591 Part D prescribers listed as Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 90 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$303,437

Of which drugs: $4,109

Medicare patients

442

Average age 75

Services billed

9,207

258 women, 184 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 36%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 81 414 $2,228
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 180 3,520 $315
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 38 218 $167

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

568 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record