Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hannah St Jeor

Nurse Practitioner Rochester, MN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1023598059 CMS profile 10584022

200 1St St Sw, Rochester, MN 55905

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,123

153 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hannah St Jeor of Rochester, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,123 across 153 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $318 3
2024 General $59 3
2023 General $1,683 95
2022 General $1,062 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hannah St Jeor
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hannah St Jeor were reported at $318. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Hannah St Jeor Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,062 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,683 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $59 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $318 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,264 66 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $633 25 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $221 6 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $194 13 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $127 6 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $100 6 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $92 5 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $75 4 payments
  9. Mannkind Corporation $74 4 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $57 3 payments
  11. Other $285 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,111 152 payments
  2. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Ozempic $710 54 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $637 53 payments
  3. MOUNJARO $434 13 payments
  4. Wegovy $241 6 payments
  5. FreeStyle Libre 3 $161 11 payments
  6. MINIMED 780G $135 2 payments
  7. Kerendia $100 6 payments
  8. EVENITY $92 5 payments
  9. Prolia $92 5 payments
  10. SOLIQUA 100/33 $90 4 payments
  11. Other $908 49 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

500

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$114,611

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

26.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 32 $53,489
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $36,509
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 16 $12,986
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 13 $6,702
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 14 $842
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 75 $721
Metformin Hcl Generic 37 $401
Glimepiride Generic 18 $290
Gabapentin Generic 18 $287
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 13 $250

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $30
$30 32 —
AFREZZA
  • Mannkind Corporation $20
$20 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $9
$9 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

153 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record