Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Hamid Sami

Neurology Meriden, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1750327482 CMS profile 170566

455 Lewis Ave Ste 202, Meriden, CT 06451

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$73,489

1,651 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Hamid Sami of Meriden, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $73,489 across 1,651 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,664 357
2024 General $15,630 343
2023 General $19,841 299
2022 General $10,880 222
2021 General $8,414 201
2020 General $3,040 106
2019 General $5,021 123

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Hamid Sami
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Hamid Sami were reported at $10,664. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Hamid Sami Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $5,021 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $3,040 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $8,414 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $10,880 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $19,841 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $15,630 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $10,664 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $9,000 25 payments
  2. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $8,144 21 payments
  3. Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC $7,331 34 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $4,727 254 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,609 6 payments
  6. EMD Serono, Inc. $3,553 126 payments
  7. Argenx US, Inc. $2,140 9 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,138 81 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $1,799 27 payments
  10. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,798 62 payments
  11. Other $29,251 1,006 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $42,419 1,605 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $20,400 18 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $6,455 4 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,611 9 payments
  5. Education $604 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QUVIVIQ $9,000 25 payments
  2. DYSPORT $8,144 21 payments
  3. Xeomin $6,467 14 payments
  4. UBRELVY $2,811 161 payments
  5. QULIPTA $1,817 106 payments
  6. ACTIVA $1,778 11 payments
  7. KESIMPTA $1,606 57 payments
  8. Mavenclad $1,306 11 payments
  9. OCREVUS $1,175 28 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $1,035 79 payments
  11. Other $31,850 1,239 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

6,326

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$3,230,552

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

30.7%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Keveyis Dichlorphenamide Brand 12 $548,951
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 305 $442,480
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 51 $339,747
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 159 $277,804
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 12 $239,060
Gammaked Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 24 $226,717
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 17 $226,472
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 14 $193,348
Gilenya Fingolimod Hcl Brand 12 $127,325
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 112 $88,339

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$129,480

Of which drugs: $54,821

Medicare patients

209

Average age 71

Services billed

12,879

134 women, 75 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 53%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, incobotulinumtoxin a, 1 unit J0588 Office 16 8,100 $31,710
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 19 208 $1,071

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 59 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Xeomin
$6,376 — 8,100
KESIMPTA
$476 — —
UBRELVY
$409 37 —
QULIPTA
$400 15 —
VUMERITY
$326 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 59 with Patron

Records

1,651 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record