Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Derek Smith

Neurology Norwich, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1407869019 CMS profile 291148

One Towne Park Plaza, Norwich, CT 06360

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$468,988

1,719 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$91,665 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Derek Smith of Norwich, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $468,988 across 1,719 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $91,665 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $77,297 318
2024 General $53,088 264
2023 General $42,696 275
2022 General $62,296 253
2021 General $36,805 183
2020 General $59,272 199
2019 General $137,535 227

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Derek Smith
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Derek Smith were reported at $77,297. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Derek Smith Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $137,535 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $59,272 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $36,805 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $62,296 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $42,696 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $53,088 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $77,297 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $147,861 227 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $83,053 196 payments
  3. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $80,253 76 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $40,658 44 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $31,719 94 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $24,164 101 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $23,401 157 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $11,846 32 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $5,797 49 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $3,239 142 payments
  11. Other $16,999 601 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $310,478 122 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $93,969 28 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $41,829 1,471 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $22,427 91 payments
  5. Education $286 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BRIUMVI $80,253 76 payments
  2. ZEPOSIA $63,984 142 payments
  3. TYSABRI $51,112 125 payments
  4. VUMERITY $43,486 70 payments
  5. Mavenclad Neurology $40,881 50 payments
  6. OCREVUS $33,934 84 payments
  7. TECFIDERA $31,357 45 payments
  8. MAYZENT $18,078 38 payments
  9. Mavenclad Neurology $16,446 35 payments
  10. Evobrutinib $11,815 2 payments
  11. Other $61,207 1,157 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 57 drugs

Part D claims

2,639

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$4,303,294

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

33.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ocrevus Ocrelizumab Brand 32 $1,343,353
Tysabri Natalizumab Brand 78 $688,952
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 46 $399,226
Tecfidera Dimethyl Fumarate Brand 36 $386,249
Fingolimod Fingolimod Hcl Brand 77 $359,187
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 66 $150,558
Mayzent Siponimod Brand 17 $146,552
Gilenya Fingolimod Hcl Brand 12 $128,015
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 18 $121,067
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 74 $97,068

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 57 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$24,719

Of which drugs: $338

Medicare patients

183

Average age 65

Services billed

21,207

133 women, 50 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 46%
Depression 34%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
COPD 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 14 36 $71

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRIUMVI
$26,265 — —
ZEPOSIA
$12,372 — —
OCREVUS
$8,442 32 —
KESIMPTA
$652 46 —
TYSABRI
$258 78 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,719 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record