Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gunjan Patel

Pain Medicine Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1972765667 CMS profile 43774

2222 Greenhouse Rd Ste 300, Houston, TX 77084

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$165,831

540 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gunjan Patel of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $165,831 across 540 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $16,615 56
2024 General $60,075 118
2023 General $40,308 95
2022 General $16,159 59
2021 General $15,438 74
2020 General $13,233 68
2019 General $4,003 70

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gunjan Patel
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gunjan Patel were reported at $16,615. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Gunjan Patel Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,003 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $13,233 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $15,438 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $16,159 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $40,308 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $60,075 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $16,615 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $107,204 267 payments
  2. Curonix LLC $26,709 32 payments
  3. Medtronic USA, Inc. $15,188 103 payments
  4. Stryker Corporation $10,257 16 payments
  5. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,258 16 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $1,108 15 payments
  7. Medinc of Texas $711 3 payments
  8. Vertos Medical, Inc. $345 3 payments
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $321 3 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $305 10 payments
  11. Other $2,425 72 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $96,468 23 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $32,036 16 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $18,801 404 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $17,010 94 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $1,500 1 payment
  6. Education $18 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $72,534 160 payments
  2. PNS FREEDOM-4A PERMANENT NEUROSTIMULATOR RECEIVER KIT CHANNEL A $26,569 31 payments
  3. VANTA ADAPTIVESTIM $13,712 25 payments
  4. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $10,603 33 payments
  5. RESTORE Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $9,812 8 payments
  6. MULTIGEN 2 $4,455 4 payments
  7. RESTORE Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $3,240 1 payment
  8. VERTAPLEX $3,150 1 payment
  9. INTELLIS Spinal Cord Neurostimulation $2,433 68 payments
  10. Inflate FX $2,160 1 payment
  11. Other $16,669 245 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

696

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$7,332

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

14.2%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gabapentin Generic 162 $2,242
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 88 $1,972
Methocarbamol Generic 100 $882
Methylprednisolone Generic 96 $575
Cephalexin Generic 48 $432
Tramadol Hcl Generic 59 $259
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 46 $202
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 16 $193
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 30 $178
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 11 $171

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$109,021

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

211

Average age 75

Services billed

1,507

132 women, 79 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 29%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
COPD 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
HYQVIA
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $46
$46 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $7
$7 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $7
$7 — —
KISUNLA
  • Lilly USA, LLC $7
$7 — —
AMYVID
  • Lilly USA, LLC $7
$7 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

540 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record