Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ellen Lin

Pain Medicine San Antonio, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1548273501 CMS profile 296394

255 E Sonterra Blvd Ste 216, Advanced Spine And Pain Center, San Antonio, TX 78258

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$118,027

1,488 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$21,487

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$133,201 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Ellen Lin of San Antonio, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $118,027 across 1,488 general payments and $21,487 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $133,201 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,608 180
2024 General $8,690 133
2023 General $4,269 127
2022 General $9,600 151
2022 Research $21,441 3
2021 General $15,201 214
2020 General $19,916 260
2020 Research $45 1
2019 General $52,743 423

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ellen Lin
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ellen Lin were reported at $7,608. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Ellen Lin Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $52,743 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $19,916 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $15,201 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $9,600 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $4,269 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $8,690 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $7,608 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $72,448 535 payments
  2. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $10,846 48 payments
  3. Globus Medical, Inc. $6,136 120 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $5,514 18 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $3,734 193 payments
  6. Curonix LLC $3,483 15 payments
  7. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $2,407 4 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $1,642 27 payments
  9. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $1,204 123 payments
  10. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,177 10 payments
  11. Other $9,436 395 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $44,305 1,402 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $33,825 12 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $13,714 39 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $11,575 9 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $10,805 9 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $2,000 2 payments
  7. Entertainment $1,366 4 payments
  8. Gift $239 4 payments
  9. Education $197 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $56,563 318 payments
  2. Omnia $10,252 137 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $7,921 22 payments
  4. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $5,035 115 payments
  5. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $3,754 76 payments
  6. PNS FREEDOM-4A PERMANENT NEUROSTIMULATOR RECEIVER KIT CHANNEL A $3,483 15 payments
  7. AJOVY $2,830 139 payments
  8. StimQ Freedom-8A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $2,290 7 payments
  9. StimQ Receiver Stimulator Kit Channel A US w/Receiver $2,290 7 payments
  10. Freedom-8A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $2,290 7 payments
  11. Other $26,667 745 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $21,441 3 payments
  2. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $45 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

2,697

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$425,810

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

52.7%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 99 $174,579
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 52 $104,438
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 73 $53,865
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 19 $34,356
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 975 $25,090
Buprenorphine Generic 30 $11,055
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 127 $3,332
Baclofen Generic 197 $2,243
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 32 $2,058
Pregabalin Generic 111 $1,881

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 71 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$870,272

Of which drugs: $2,646

Medicare patients

964

Average age 75

Services billed

19,734

608 women, 356 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 25%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 133 11,857 $1,194
Injection, diazepam, up to 5 mg J3360 Office 82 95 $400
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 258 1,130 $321
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 34 38 $275
Injection, midazolam hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2250 Office 342 1,412 $153
Injection, cefazolin sodium, 500 mg J0690 Office 53 176 $110
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 21 22 $96
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 461 847 $80

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Crysvita
$194 — —
Nucynta
$117 151 —
ZAVZPRET
$109 — —
BELBUCA
$107 73 —
NURTEC ODT
$94 19 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,492 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record