Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Grant Bailey

Cardiovascular Disease Littleton, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1881919660 CMS profile 2107901

1000 Southpark Dr, Littleton, CO 80120

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$87,996

798 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$11,926

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$88,566 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2024

Through program year 2025, Grant Bailey of Littleton, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $87,996 across 798 general payments and $11,926 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $88,566 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,420 156
2024 General $5,760 161
2023 General $13,293 125
2023 Research $120 1
2022 General $10,564 95
2022 Research $10,779 2
2021 General $8,890 86
2021 Research $1,028 1
2020 General $577 23
2019 General $38,493 152

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Grant Bailey
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Grant Bailey were reported at $10,420. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Grant Bailey Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $38,493 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $577 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $8,890 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $10,564 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $13,293 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $5,760 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $10,420 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $31,034 54 payments
  2. Amarin Pharma Inc. $17,655 20 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $10,842 20 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $4,916 60 payments
  5. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $4,309 16 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $4,130 71 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $2,403 144 payments
  8. HeartFlow, Inc. $1,569 41 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,381 58 payments
  10. Shockwave Medical, Inc $1,247 22 payments
  11. Other $8,510 292 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $55,460 30 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,841 736 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $7,415 5 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $4,127 22 payments
  5. Education $153 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $30,845 44 payments
  2. Vascepa $17,623 18 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $10,814 18 payments
  4. Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve $2,466 3 payments
  5. Repatha $1,703 127 payments
  6. Mitra Clip system $1,613 18 payments
  7. FFRct $1,436 40 payments
  8. Barostim Neo System $1,021 12 payments
  9. Shockwave IVL System with the Shockwave C2 Coronary IVL Catheter $893 17 payments
  10. CAMZYOS $731 39 payments
  11. Other $13,357 518 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $11,926 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 55 drugs

Part D claims

7,044

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$2,335,650

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

27%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 415 $528,557
Vyndamax Tafamidis Brand 14 $362,694
Camzyos Mavacamten Brand 43 $343,023
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 197 $235,488
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 149 $215,853
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 155 $203,150
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 123 $159,038
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 69 $119,110
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 43 $48,862
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 31 $24,114

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 55 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$251,817

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,437

Average age 76

Services billed

3,681

662 women, 775 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 61%
Arthritis 49%
Heart failure 36%
Atrial fibrillation 35%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 26%
Cancer 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
$360 197 —
CAMZYOS
$355 43 —
WAINUA
$247 — —
LEQVIO
$223 — —
Arcalyst
$117 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

802 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record