Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Payal Kohli

Cardiovascular Disease Aurora, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1447459771 CMS profile 110638

1411 S Potomac St, Ste 190, Aurora, CO 80012

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,718,232

1,729 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Payal Kohli of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,718,232 across 1,729 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $522,838 498
2024 General $342,631 327
2023 General $330,167 334
2022 General $288,638 294
2021 General $170,781 175
2020 General $40,708 45
2019 General $22,470 56

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Payal Kohli
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Payal Kohli were reported at $522,838. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Payal Kohli Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $22,470 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $40,708 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $170,781 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $288,638 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $330,167 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $342,631 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $522,838 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $332,550 378 payments
  2. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $295,971 265 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $217,603 207 payments
  4. Amarin Pharma Inc. $160,573 133 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $152,999 123 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $101,292 128 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $93,623 63 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $87,401 99 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $63,380 45 payments
  10. HeartFlow, Inc. $47,539 39 payments
  11. Other $165,302 249 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,128,873 429 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $300,159 118 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $245,461 618 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $33,628 558 payments
  5. Education $5,111 5 payments
  6. Honoraria $5,000 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NEXLETOL $295,971 265 payments
  2. NEXLIZET $295,202 253 payments
  3. Repatha Cardiology $221,936 226 payments
  4. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $193,301 182 payments
  5. Vascepa $160,573 133 payments
  6. Kerendia $139,985 120 payments
  7. ZEPBOUND $99,174 119 payments
  8. REPATHA Cardiovascular $97,611 121 payments
  9. VERQUVO Cardiovascular $59,725 55 payments
  10. FFRct $47,539 39 payments
  11. Other $277,281 395 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

2,008

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$457,571

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

33.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 146 $140,542
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 122 $109,480
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 154 $99,386
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 18 $26,134
Wegovy Semaglutide Brand 16 $21,057
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 21 $19,154
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 28 $14,430
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 13 $8,782
Dapagliflozin Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 12 $6,259
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 220 $2,981

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$92,987

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

180

Average age 72

Services billed

1,867

94 women, 86 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 54%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 26%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Heart failure 22%
Depression 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
$108,405 154 —
NEXLETOL
$39,603 — —
NEXLIZET
$39,487 — —
LODOCO
$14,497 — —
Ozempic
$9,834 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,729 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record