Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gordon Wotton

Internal Medicine Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1952358012 CMS profile 270530

975 Johnson Fy Rd Ne, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30342

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,437

1,035 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gordon Wotton of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,437 across 1,035 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,464 120
2024 General $2,613 134
2023 General $2,644 138
2022 General $2,906 161
2021 General $2,787 164
2020 General $2,195 140
2019 General $2,829 178

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gordon Wotton
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gordon Wotton were reported at $2,464. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Gordon Wotton Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,829 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,195 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,787 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,906 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,644 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,613 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,464 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,638 169 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $2,218 139 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,545 84 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $1,479 70 payments
  5. IBSA Pharma Inc. $876 49 payments
  6. Corcept Therapeutics $806 40 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $804 43 payments
  8. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $746 39 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $703 38 payments
  10. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $663 34 payments
  11. Other $5,959 330 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,276 1,029 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $72 1 payment
  3. Gift $59 1 payment
  4. Education $30 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $2,163 141 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,760 119 payments
  3. EVENITY $996 57 payments
  4. Prolia $966 54 payments
  5. Tirosint $876 49 payments
  6. Korlym $806 40 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $784 39 payments
  8. UNITHROID $746 39 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $647 36 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $647 44 payments
  11. Other $14,027 787 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

3,205

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$1,613,365

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

76.4%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 286 $382,900
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 170 $183,517
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 127 $145,569
Somatuline Depot Lanreotide Acetate Brand 13 $122,243
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 146 $107,572
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 107 $102,996
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 130 $100,836
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 54 $85,252
Prolia Denosumab Brand 34 $58,489
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 35 $48,096

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$203,476

Of which drugs: $141,304

Medicare patients

418

Average age 75

Services billed

7,951

264 women, 154 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 42%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Osteoporosis 27%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 71 6,960 $141,304

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$231 170 —
MOUNJARO
$196 127 —
TEPEZZA
$183 — —
Ozempic
$181 286 —
TZIELD
$170 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,035 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record