Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gilbert Gelfand

Rheumatology Whittier, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1942247580 CMS profile 133617

12456 Washington Blvd, Whittier, CA 90602

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,888

208 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gilbert Gelfand of Whittier, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,888 across 208 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 60th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,025 34
2024 General $611 22
2023 General $930 25
2022 General $786 38
2021 General $689 40
2020 General $228 12
2019 General $619 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gilbert Gelfand
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gilbert Gelfand were reported at $1,025. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Gilbert Gelfand Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $619 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $228 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $689 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $786 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $930 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $611 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,025 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,114 51 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $580 27 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $570 27 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $560 31 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $402 17 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $350 10 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $240 2 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $212 9 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $200 11 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $164 6 payments
  11. Other $497 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,679 205 payments
  2. Education $209 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,001 46 payments
  2. XELJANZ $517 29 payments
  3. TREMFYA $321 7 payments
  4. COSENTYX Immunology $298 15 payments
  5. KRYSTEXXA $289 10 payments
  6. TAVNEOS $286 11 payments
  7. OFEV $248 2 payments
  8. COSENTYX Dermatology $208 9 payments
  9. ORENCIA $200 11 payments
  10. Actemra $164 6 payments
  11. Other $1,973 102 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 67 drugs

Part D claims

4,463

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,737,023

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

24.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 87 $625,212
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 47 $485,851
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 51 $440,289
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 57 $333,463
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 29 $188,707
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 11 $125,315
Prolia Denosumab Brand 72 $122,059
Orencia Abatacept Brand 16 $82,849
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 20 $67,098
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 11 $55,969

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 67 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$325,146

Of which drugs: $174,303

Medicare patients

338

Average age 75

Services billed

16,853

272 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 57%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 20%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 82 4,796 $97,271
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 66 3,075 $316
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 12 44 $178
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 20 24 $111
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 20 mg J1020 Office 13 15 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $143
$143 87 —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $116
$116 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $67
$67 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $57
$57 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $56
$56 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

208 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record