Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gerald Appel

Nephrology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1306918651 CMS profile 104189

622 W 168Th St, New York, NY 10032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$841,694

616 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,437

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$616,181 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Gerald Appel of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $841,694 across 616 general payments and $1,437 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $616,181 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $192,362 150
2024 General $157,073 125
2024 Research $1,437 2
2023 General $169,726 121
2022 General $129,656 90
2021 General $93,797 63
2020 General $27,200 10
2019 General $71,879 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gerald Appel
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gerald Appel were reported at $192,362. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Gerald Appel Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $71,879 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $27,200 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $93,797 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $129,656 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $169,726 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $157,073 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $192,362 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $366,977 257 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $166,528 125 payments
  3. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $142,337 115 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $40,270 31 payments
  5. Genentech, Inc. $25,387 13 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $22,492 21 payments
  7. Retrophin, Inc. $21,754 26 payments
  8. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $13,430 5 payments
  9. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $9,497 5 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $9,307 6 payments
  11. Other $23,716 12 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $342,129 193 payments
  2. Honoraria $279,438 94 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $107,888 43 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $101,343 159 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $10,897 127 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TARPEYO Nephrology $216,812 154 payments
  2. BENLYSTA $166,528 125 payments
  3. TARPEYO Nephrology $150,165 103 payments
  4. LUPKYNIS $109,163 90 payments
  5. LEMTRADA $40,270 31 payments
  6. Rituxan $22,174 19 payments
  7. GAZYVA $11,413 9 payments
  8. Ultomiris $6,500 2 payments
  9. Tavneos $4,125 1 payment
  10. Filspari $1,136 7 payments
  11. Other $92 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $1,437 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

12

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$51

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Zolpidem Tartrate Generic 12 $51

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$40,570

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

131

Average age 70

Services billed

259

59 women, 72 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 30%
Heart failure 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Depression 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TARPEYO
  • CALLIDITAS THERAPEUTICS US INC. $122,900
$122,900 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $19,269
$19,269 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $11,375
$11,375 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

618 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record