Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Gary Bohay

Internal Medicine Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1679534887 CMS profile 166928

1200 N El Dorado Pl Ste D-400, Tucson, AZ 85715

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,514

812 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Gary Bohay of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,514 across 812 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,285 128
2024 General $2,507 141
2023 General $2,075 120
2022 General $1,894 112
2021 General $1,881 121
2020 General $1,672 106
2019 General $1,199 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Gary Bohay
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Gary Bohay were reported at $2,285. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Gary Bohay Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,199 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,672 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,881 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,894 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,075 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,507 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,285 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,592 99 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,217 74 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,125 62 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,001 46 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $904 60 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $817 61 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $793 49 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $595 41 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $508 35 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $432 28 payments
  11. Other $4,530 257 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,507 810 payments
  2. Education $7 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,165 72 payments
  2. Repatha $549 30 payments
  3. Otezla $535 29 payments
  4. EVENITY $526 35 payments
  5. FARXIGA $512 19 payments
  6. Kerendia $508 35 payments
  7. Prolia $472 31 payments
  8. UBRELVY $462 26 payments
  9. SHINGRIX $435 27 payments
  10. Ozempic $431 30 payments
  11. Other $12,801 769 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 211 drugs

Part D claims

21,293

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,501,263

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 193 $199,826
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 144 $185,224
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 89 $112,232
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 78 $82,144
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 93 $75,806
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 50 $66,984
Prolia Denosumab Brand 34 $60,949
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 60 $49,148
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 28 $44,085
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 35 $34,668

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 211 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 120 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$294,588

Of which drugs: $21,682

Medicare patients

1,080

Average age 76

Services billed

10,446

553 women, 527 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Diabetes 17%
Depression 17%
Cancer 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 48 48 $13,900
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 89 89 $7,282
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 48 84 $60

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$237 93 —
VRAYLAR
$188 — —
Kerendia
$156 — —
AIRSUPRA
$146 — —
GEMTESA
$84 35 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

812 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record