Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Garret Parker

Internal Medicine Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1194875195 CMS profile 190219

1010 N 96Th St Ste 200, Omaha, NE 68114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,698

245 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Garret Parker of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,698 across 245 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $771 43
2024 General $382 23
2023 General $739 55
2022 General $458 30
2021 General $513 34
2020 General $524 34
2019 General $311 26

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Garret Parker
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Garret Parker were reported at $771. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Garret Parker Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $311 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $524 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $513 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $458 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $739 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $382 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $771 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $892 60 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $346 21 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $294 18 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $271 18 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $253 26 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $249 17 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $187 11 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $137 9 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $111 6 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $106 8 payments
  11. Other $852 51 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,653 243 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $25 1 payment
  3. Consulting Fee $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $522 35 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $402 24 payments
  3. Kerendia $271 18 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $206 13 payments
  5. Prolia $196 13 payments
  6. Saxenda $195 15 payments
  7. UBRELVY $192 12 payments
  8. EVENITY $183 12 payments
  9. XIFAXAN $152 10 payments
  10. QULIPTA $138 8 payments
  11. Other $2,376 159 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 132 drugs

Part D claims

6,231

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$555,893

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $95,038
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 66 $71,561
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 81 $61,674
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 27 $33,572
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 26 $33,218
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 36 $32,718
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 35 $25,324
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 28 $24,018
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 18 $23,293
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 15 $19,531

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 132 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$62,452

Of which drugs: $10,059

Medicare patients

225

Average age 74

Services billed

1,766

92 women, 133 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 16 16 $1,309

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $65
$65 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $44
$44 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $40
$40 12 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $40
$40 36 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $32
$32 66 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

245 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record