Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Fred Mendoza

Internal Medicine Green Valley, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1316935042 CMS profile 14414

1055 N. Lacanada Blvd, Suite 121, Green Valley, AZ 85614

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,546

641 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Fred Mendoza of Green Valley, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,546 across 641 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14 1
2024 General $1,862 109
2023 General $1,764 99
2022 General $2,024 116
2021 General $1,928 118
2020 General $1,330 80
2019 General $1,624 118

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Fred Mendoza
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Fred Mendoza were reported at $14. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Fred Mendoza Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,624 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,330 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,928 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,024 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,764 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,862 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $14 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,607 104 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,532 109 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $899 31 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $888 71 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $522 22 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $511 28 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $437 30 payments
  8. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $364 16 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $362 24 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $311 23 payments
  11. Other $3,114 183 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,276 636 payments
  2. Education $270 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,224 86 payments
  2. EVENITY $832 53 payments
  3. Prolia $794 51 payments
  4. Repatha $751 49 payments
  5. Ozempic $721 57 payments
  6. GEMTESA $647 30 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $631 48 payments
  8. FARXIGA $602 16 payments
  9. Otezla $571 36 payments
  10. XARELTO $330 28 payments
  11. Other $8,199 490 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 201 drugs

Part D claims

19,467

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,365,749

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

14.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 171 $274,900
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 151 $199,065
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 89 $133,618
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 75 $72,383
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 37 $59,423
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 34 $54,700
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 38 $50,820
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 26 $43,925
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 29 $37,979
Prolia Denosumab Brand 18 $32,005

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 201 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 101 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$492,180

Of which drugs: $121,412

Medicare patients

824

Average age 78

Services billed

17,744

274 women, 550 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 19%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 46 4,440 $90,331
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 73 73 $21,083
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 120 120 $9,818
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 33 194 $136

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $160
$160 29 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $147
$147 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $141
$141 75 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $127
$127 — —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $105
$105 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

641 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record