Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Francisco Flores

Dermatology Miramar, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1114914934 CMS profile 186807

14601 Sw 29Th St, Suite 206, Miramar, FL 33027

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,957

892 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,656,631 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Francisco Flores of Miramar, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,957 across 892 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,656,631 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,876 227
2024 General $3,246 206
2023 General $4,207 126
2022 General $4,891 78
2021 General $7,024 98
2020 General $3,001 72
2019 General $1,712 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Francisco Flores
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Francisco Flores were reported at $3,876. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Francisco Flores Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,712 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $3,001 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $7,024 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $4,891 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $4,207 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,246 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,876 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LEO Pharma Inc. $7,958 18 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,497 166 payments
  3. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $2,757 87 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,627 133 payments
  5. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,363 54 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,365 117 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,103 54 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $953 47 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $587 29 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $582 26 payments
  11. Other $3,166 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,262 875 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $12,202 7 payments
  3. Education $481 9 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $13 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $4,049 134 payments
  2. VTAMA $2,917 106 payments
  3. ADBRY $2,625 12 payments
  4. DUOBRII $2,094 37 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,662 74 payments
  6. CIBINQO $862 72 payments
  7. Bimzelx $812 41 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $689 30 payments
  9. OPZELURA $582 26 payments
  10. HUMIRA $537 24 payments
  11. Other $8,888 493 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

3,836

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,703,661

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

17.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 45 $603,911
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 26 $530,810
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 30 $183,217
Otezla Apremilast Brand 25 $119,511
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 31 $63,402
Litfulo Ritlecitinib Tosylate Brand 11 $43,248
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 11 $37,953
Olumiant Baricitinib Brand 12 $32,467
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 318 $15,575
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 442 $13,609

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$92,793

Of which drugs: $87

Medicare patients

203

Average age 75

Services billed

2,081

118 women, 85 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Diabetes 40%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 31%
Osteoporosis 23%
COPD 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 112 $87

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$875 45 —
VTAMA
$493 — —
SKYRIZI
$465 26 —
Bimzelx
$326 — —
CIBINQO
$230 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

892 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record