Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Farrukh Pasha

Rheumatology Glendale, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1639399363 CMS profile 864955

7080 N Port Washington Rd, Rheumatic Disease Center, Glendale, WI 53217

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,020

53 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,556

Paid to them · 16 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Farrukh Pasha of Glendale, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,020 across 53 general payments and $1,556 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 51st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $153 7
2024 General $196 10
2023 General $48 2
2022 General $150 8
2021 General $178 10
2020 General $183 9
2019 General $112 7
2019 Research $1,556 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Farrukh Pasha
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Farrukh Pasha were reported at $153. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Farrukh Pasha Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $112 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $183 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $178 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $150 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $48 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $196 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $153 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $217 11 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $164 10 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $124 6 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $102 5 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $97 5 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $54 3 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $48 3 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $44 2 payments
  9. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. $27 1 payment
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $24 1 payment
  11. Other $119 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,020 53 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $204 10 payments
  2. BENLYSTA $164 10 payments
  3. RINVOQ $124 6 payments
  4. TREMFYA $75 4 payments
  5. COSENTYX $54 3 payments
  6. Enbrel $49 2 payments
  7. ORENCIA $48 3 payments
  8. SAPHNELO $44 2 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $40 2 payments
  10. OCTAGAM IMMUNE GLOBULIN (HUMAN) $37 2 payments
  11. Other $273 15 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,556 16 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 49 drugs

Part D claims

4,118

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,437,873

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 64 $523,689
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 55 $482,946
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 38 $287,747
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 41 $237,333
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 27 $159,736
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 25 $150,711
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 18 $135,838
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 20 $121,158
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $91,950
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 18 $71,839

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 49 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 84 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$837,242

Of which drugs: $741,995

Medicare patients

241

Average age 73

Services billed

54,015

176 women, 65 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Osteoporosis 30%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 24%
Diabetes 20%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 11 8,000 $270,438
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 17 7,233 $179,472
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 31 3,060 $62,174
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 13 1,391 $140

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $66
$66 52 —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $24
$24 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $22
$22 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $18
$18 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

69 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record