Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eyal Levit

MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1801813621 CMS profile 81562

35 West End Avenue, Prof. Suite 2, Brooklyn, NY 11235

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,581

732 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Eyal Levit of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,581 across 732 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,622 73
2024 General $7,041 109
2023 General $4,632 140
2022 General $2,205 100
2021 General $2,085 120
2020 General $1,814 95
2019 General $2,182 95

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eyal Levit
  • MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median
  • Middle half of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eyal Levit were reported at $1,622. Among 1,077 MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $465 and the middle half received between $145 and $1,066.

Show as a table
Year Eyal Levit MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $2,182 $316 $106–$785 $163
2020 $1,814 $162 $68–$412 $114
2021 $2,085 $243 $87–$654 $132
2022 $2,205 $300 $102–$887 $149
2023 $4,632 $364 $125–$1,010 $160
2024 $7,041 $445 $142–$1,108 $164
2025 $1,622 $465 $145–$1,066 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $4,186 33 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,354 37 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,238 93 payments
  4. Merz North America, Inc. $1,502 6 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,374 95 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,173 13 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,074 49 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $945 50 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $869 48 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $743 50 payments
  11. Other $5,122 258 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,609 717 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $4,330 2 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,740 1 payment
  4. Education $902 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VTAMA $4,209 34 payments
  2. Otezla $2,321 35 payments
  3. TREMFYA $2,062 83 payments
  4. LIBTAYO $932 5 payments
  5. Xeomin $894 3 payments
  6. OPZELURA $869 48 payments
  7. TALTZ $767 42 payments
  8. Erivedge $743 50 payments
  9. XELJANZ $634 47 payments
  10. ASCLERA $592 2 payments
  11. Other $9,441 481 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 66 drugs

Part D claims

9,266

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$3,939,278

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

24.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 37 $755,762
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 339 $670,472
Erivedge Vismodegib Brand 38 $508,757
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 136 $504,060
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 24 $320,174
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 41 $230,146
Otezla Apremilast Brand 40 $191,657
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 206 $173,497
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 68 $95,848
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 48 $59,669

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 66 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 104 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,637,804

Of which drugs: $245,565

Medicare patients

2,183

Average age 79

Services billed

25,912

1,359 women, 824 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 72%
Diabetes 64%
Ischemic heart disease 54%
Depression 35%
Heart failure 31%
Osteoporosis 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 25 8,602 $11,510
Oasis wound matrix, per square centimeter Q4102 Office 12 471 $4,507
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 62 95 $73

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VTAMA
$3,997 68 —
LIBTAYO
$850 — —
TREMFYA
$423 24 —
DAXXIFY
$281 — —
DUPIXENT
$197 136 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

732 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other MOHS-Micrographic Surgery in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record