Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Everett McKibben

General Practice Starkville, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1093873713 CMS profile 95219

The Laird Clinic, 103 Doctors Park, Starkville, MS 39759

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,075

140 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Everett McKibben of Starkville, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,075 across 140 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $185 9
2024 General $170 10
2023 General $207 12
2022 General $223 14
2021 General $522 39
2020 General $416 29
2019 General $352 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Everett McKibben
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Everett McKibben were reported at $185. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Everett McKibben General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $352 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $416 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $522 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $223 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $207 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $170 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $185 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $339 24 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $246 19 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $235 20 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $199 11 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $145 10 payments
  6. Mylan Specialty L.P. $104 5 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $101 7 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $100 6 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $87 6 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $57 4 payments
  11. Other $462 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,075 140 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EVENITY $198 14 payments
  2. Prolia $181 13 payments
  3. Ozempic $153 13 payments
  4. Repatha $141 10 payments
  5. PREVNAR 20 $138 6 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $128 9 payments
  7. TRULICITY $127 9 payments
  8. COMIRNATY $121 5 payments
  9. Tresiba $110 7 payments
  10. ABRYSVO $103 4 payments
  11. Other $1,871 124 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 200 drugs

Part D claims

13,036

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$655,660

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

18.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 209 $112,837
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 82 $48,515
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 40 $47,537
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 75 $40,421
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 33 $29,869
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 41 $28,123
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 58 $25,739
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $25,031
Caplyta Lumateperone Tosylate Brand 26 $21,731
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 15 $18,889

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 200 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 91 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$149,572

Of which drugs: $30,675

Medicare patients

403

Average age 76

Services billed

10,655

243 women, 160 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 15%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
COPD 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 781 $12,582
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 75 75 $6,137
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 20 20 $5,805
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 31 31 $2,536
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 15 15 $2,267
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 43 3,763 $371
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 41 121 $93
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 20 20 $77

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
YUPELRI
  • Mylan Specialty L.P. $24
$24 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $17
$17 — —
CAPLYTA
  • ITI, Inc. $16
$16 26 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $13
$13 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $8
$8 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

140 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record