Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Eugene Wang

Pain Medicine Smithtown, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1912223108 CMS profile 177114

994 W Jericho Tpke Ste 104, Smithtown, NY 11787

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,741

546 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$500 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Eugene Wang of Smithtown, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,741 across 546 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $500 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,351 56
2024 General $7,513 132
2023 General $5,294 101
2022 General $1,608 66
2021 General $1,648 95
2020 General $701 27
2019 General $1,627 69

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Eugene Wang
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Eugene Wang were reported at $3,351. Among 95 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $405 and the middle half received between $116 and $1,740.

Show as a table
Year Eugene Wang Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,627 $298 $103–$1,153 $163
2020 $701 $188 $57–$916 $114
2021 $1,648 $365 $109–$1,150 $132
2022 $1,608 $498 $104–$1,575 $149
2023 $5,294 $334 $108–$1,267 $160
2024 $7,513 $544 $144–$1,302 $164
2025 $3,351 $405 $116–$1,740 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $7,250 112 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,210 49 payments
  3. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $1,624 17 payments
  4. Nevro Corp. $1,482 32 payments
  5. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $1,397 20 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,207 82 payments
  7. Nalu Medical, Inc. $850 11 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $740 38 payments
  9. Bioventus LLC $652 3 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $427 21 payments
  11. Other $3,901 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,861 505 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,443 38 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $375 1 payment
  4. Education $62 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $5,873 76 payments
  2. Intracept Pain $2,081 25 payments
  3. Intracept Pain $1,597 16 payments
  4. Intracept Pain $1,597 16 payments
  5. Intracept Pain $1,597 16 payments
  6. Prospera $1,397 20 payments
  7. Nalu Neurostimulation System $850 11 payments
  8. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $757 21 payments
  9. UBRELVY $660 45 payments
  10. Stimrouter Implantable Kit $652 3 payments
  11. Other $9,228 374 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

280

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$26,300

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 12 $22,211
Pregabalin Generic 47 $1,900
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 34 $596
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 32 $524
Celecoxib Generic 13 $346
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 25 $151
Gabapentin Generic 25 $133
Tramadol Hcl Generic 29 $112
Nortriptyline Hcl Generic 12 $97
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 11 $84

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$547,608

Of which drugs: $3,531

Medicare patients

947

Average age 71

Services billed

6,766

570 women, 377 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 33%
COPD 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Osteoporosis 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 37 38 $292
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 119 153 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
$111 — —
UBRELVY
$96 — —
QULIPTA
$94 — —
ZTLido
$68 — —
VYEPTI
$35 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

546 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record