Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Boris Leybel

Pain Medicine New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1578508685 CMS profile 297648

225 Broadway, Suite 1012, 10Th Fl., New York, NY 10007

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$58,252

1,126 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Boris Leybel of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $58,252 across 1,126 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,660 108
2024 General $6,373 163
2023 General $6,664 181
2022 General $15,071 226
2021 General $21,131 253
2020 General $3,122 114
2019 General $1,231 81

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Boris Leybel
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Boris Leybel were reported at $4,660. Among 95 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $405 and the middle half received between $116 and $1,740.

Show as a table
Year Boris Leybel Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,231 $298 $103–$1,153 $163
2020 $3,122 $188 $57–$916 $114
2021 $21,131 $365 $109–$1,150 $132
2022 $15,071 $498 $104–$1,575 $149
2023 $6,664 $334 $108–$1,267 $160
2024 $6,373 $544 $144–$1,302 $164
2025 $4,660 $405 $116–$1,740 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $21,956 142 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $12,646 58 payments
  3. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $7,620 52 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $2,759 45 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $2,236 154 payments
  6. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,660 90 payments
  7. US WorldMeds, LLC $1,132 58 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,100 76 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $860 54 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $701 49 payments
  11. Other $5,582 348 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $40,300 32 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $17,873 1,076 payments
  3. Education $78 17 payments
  4. Gift $0 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $20,266 110 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $18,222 88 payments
  3. QULIPTA $10,096 71 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $1,727 22 payments
  5. ZTLido $1,572 83 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT Pain $1,035 72 payments
  7. Austedo XR $849 59 payments
  8. AJOVY $787 54 payments
  9. PENNSAID $748 46 payments
  10. EMGALITY $600 46 payments
  11. Other $10,840 686 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

2,029

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$621,980

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

35.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 77 $130,318
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 16 $103,968
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 12 $89,495
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 80 $43,665
Namzaric Memantine Hcl/Donepezil Hcl Brand 75 $42,035
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 57 $25,408
Nourianz Istradefylline Brand 11 $22,935
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 50 $22,722
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 15 $22,273
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 28 $21,169

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$376,725

Of which drugs: $171,321

Medicare patients

244

Average age 75

Services billed

37,513

147 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 55%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Depression 33%
Heart failure 25%
Alzheimer's or dementia 23%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 49 27,800 $137,321
Hyaluronan or derivitive, genvisc 850, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7320 Office 30 6,378 $27,429
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 66 641 $56

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$2,296 — —
QULIPTA
$1,734 21 —
ZTLido
$505 80 —
Apokyn
$470 — —
Austedo XR
$267 28 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,126 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record