Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Erin Siceloff

Physician Assistant Charlotte, NC Physician Assistant

NPI 1376564104 CMS profile 11166458

7810 Ballantyne Commons Pkwy Ste 300, Charlotte, NC 28277

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,946

529 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Erin Siceloff of Charlotte, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,946 across 529 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25,420 199
2024 General $10,923 138
2023 General $5,426 105
2022 General $2,159 58
2021 General $6,018 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Erin Siceloff
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Erin Siceloff were reported at $25,420. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Erin Siceloff Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $6,018 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,159 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $5,426 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $10,923 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $25,420 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $28,641 85 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $8,137 24 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $2,151 124 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $2,097 31 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,892 34 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $1,636 64 payments
  7. Sobi, Inc $1,380 7 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $862 32 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $639 23 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $477 18 payments
  11. Other $2,034 87 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $20,495 12 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,210 471 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $11,251 39 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,420 2 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,440 1 payment
  6. Education $131 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. COSENTYX Dermatology $9,934 49 payments
  2. OFEV Respiratory $7,003 19 payments
  3. COSENTYX Immunology $4,280 12 payments
  4. XELJANZ $2,097 31 payments
  5. GAMIFANT $1,206 2 payments
  6. RINVOQ $1,063 43 payments
  7. OFEV Respiratory $947 3 payments
  8. Otezla $829 51 payments
  9. TREMFYA $740 26 payments
  10. SAPHNELO $639 23 payments
  11. Other $7,027 326 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

1,470

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$119,304

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

12.9%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $95,554
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 210 $7,108
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 143 $3,545
Leflunomide Generic 39 $2,170
Tramadol Hcl Generic 203 $1,712
Prednisone Generic 292 $1,482
Celecoxib Generic 67 $1,272
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 55 $826
Colchicine Generic 15 $794
Etodolac Generic 24 $746

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$43,468

Of which drugs: $223

Medicare patients

279

Average age 73

Services billed

2,526

239 women, 40 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Osteoporosis 45%
Depression 31%
Diabetes 20%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 1,200 $109
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 28 99 $68

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $7,003
$7,003 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $281
$281 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $275
$275 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $272
$272 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $262
$262 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

529 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record