Medical Doctor Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Elisabeth Jappay

Internal Medicine Salem, OR Medical Doctor

NPI 1538214036 CMS profile 115057

1234 Commercial St Se, Salem, OR 97302

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,686

213 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Elisabeth Jappay of Salem, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,686 across 213 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $71 3
2021 General $945 54
2020 General $1,422 84
2019 General $1,248 72

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Elisabeth Jappay
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Elisabeth Jappay were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Elisabeth Jappay Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,248 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,422 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $945 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $71 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $0 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $0 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Amgen Inc. $606 29 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $567 34 payments
  3. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $346 16 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $328 19 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $184 14 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $177 11 payments
  7. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $168 4 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $142 12 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $130 12 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $117 7 payments
  11. Other $919 55 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Food and Beverage $3,673 211 payments
  2. Education $12 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. XARELTO $567 34 payments
  2. AIMOVIG $407 18 payments
  3. INVOKANA $394 25 payments
  4. Livalo $346 16 payments
  5. Repatha $301 16 payments
  6. Bystolic $295 14 payments
  7. Prolia $210 12 payments
  8. FARXIGA $209 12 payments
  9. Ozempic $177 11 payments
  10. Ajovy $168 4 payments
  11. Other $2,564 167 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

213 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Oregon

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record