Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edward Stevenson

Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease Colorado Springs, CO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1780948893 CMS profile 869392

5755 Mark Dabling Blvd Ste 190, Colorado Springs, CO 80919

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,407

142 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edward Stevenson of Colorado Springs, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,407 across 142 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $801 31
2024 General $609 27
2023 General $797 31
2022 General $503 21
2021 General $280 13
2020 General $169 9
2019 General $248 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edward Stevenson
  • Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease median
  • Middle half of Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edward Stevenson were reported at $801. Among 42 Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $471 and the middle half received between $198 and $5,376.

Show as a table
Year Edward Stevenson Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $248 $403 $156–$5,734 $163
2020 $169 $164 $99–$6,393 $114
2021 $280 $240 $102–$2,572 $132
2022 $503 $503 $154–$5,143 $149
2023 $797 $655 $222–$5,436 $160
2024 $609 $567 $227–$2,571 $164
2025 $801 $471 $198–$5,376 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $466 23 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $382 16 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $291 13 payments
  4. Astellas Pharma US Inc $286 13 payments
  5. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $266 9 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $213 10 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $164 6 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $146 6 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $131 1 payment
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $124 7 payments
  11. Other $939 38 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,348 141 payments
  2. Education $59 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OZURDEX Eye Care $368 17 payments
  2. VABYSMO $344 14 payments
  3. Izervay $293 12 payments
  4. YUTIQ $197 6 payments
  5. OZURDEX Retina $176 12 payments
  6. Cequa $164 6 payments
  7. TAVNEOS $131 1 payment
  8. LUMIGAN $117 1 payment
  9. XIIDRA $109 6 payments
  10. XIPERE $95 1 payment
  11. Other $1,543 70 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

1,004

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$57,887

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

37.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 21 $9,963
Fluorometholone Generic 117 $8,071
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 12 $6,908
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 19 $5,599
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 19 $5,402
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 11 $5,366
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 18 $3,211
Latanoprost Generic 281 $2,681
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 66 $2,241
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 145 $2,058

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$518,955

Of which drugs: $385,049

Medicare patients

292

Average age 75

Services billed

8,550

168 women, 124 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 21%
COPD 17%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 17 5,040 $138,078
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 12 106 $67,068
Injection, ranibizumab-nuna, biosimilar, (byooviz), 0.1 mg Q5124 Office 16 325 $42,311
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 20 32 $1,409

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $177
$177 — —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $116
$116 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $78
$78 — 5,040
BYOOVIZ
  • Biogen, Inc. $78
$78 — 325
Simbrinza
  • Alcon Vision LLC $42
$42 19 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

142 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record