Product Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Xipere

Drug Ophthalmology

NDC 71565-040-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$891,976

3,428 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2023, $891,976 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Xipere (Ophthalmology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 General $251,553 1,424
2022 General $561,963 1,882
2021 General $78,460 122

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $813,510 3,305 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $78,460 122 payments
  3. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $6 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2023
  1. Steven Yeh Ophthalmology · Atlanta, GA $23,079 9% · 20 payments
  2. Peter Chang Ophthalmology · Waltham, MA $18,483 7% · 19 payments
  3. Vinay Shah Retina Specialist · Oklahoma City, OK $11,667 5% · 1 payment
  4. Stephen Anesi Ophthalmology · Waltham, MA $11,158 4% · 9 payments
  5. Rajiv Shah Ophthalmology · Winston Salem, NC $10,412 4% · 15 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2023
  1. Ophthalmology $174,202 71% · 434 practitioners
  2. Retina Specialist Ophthalmology $56,628 23% · 250 practitioners
  3. Uveitis and Ocular Inflammatory Disease Ophthalmology $13,196 5% · 15 practitioners
  4. Optometrist $1,214 <1% · 41 practitioners
  5. Glaucoma Specialist Ophthalmology $368 <1% · 7 practitioners

The top 5 of 17 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2023. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2023
  1. Massachusetts $40,531 16% · 17 recipients
  2. Texas $27,655 11% · 47 recipients
  3. Georgia $23,936 10% · 20 recipients
  4. California $20,982 8% · 108 recipients
  5. Ohio $15,117 6% · 40 recipients

The top 5 of 41 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to XIPERE
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide (xipere), 1 mg J3299 27 27,502 $1,039,981

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

3,428 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record