Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edgar Martorell

Rheumatology Orlando, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1336115773 CMS profile 105904

6735 Conroy Windermere Rd, Suite 320, Orlando, FL 32835

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,328

756 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edgar Martorell of Orlando, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,328 across 756 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,168 110
2024 General $3,115 145
2023 General $2,470 125
2022 General $2,482 129
2021 General $2,557 108
2020 General $727 43
2019 General $1,809 96

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edgar Martorell
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edgar Martorell were reported at $2,168. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Edgar Martorell Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,809 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $727 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,557 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,482 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,470 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,115 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,168 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,498 161 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,606 99 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,481 107 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,436 50 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,382 44 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,246 53 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $807 25 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $795 52 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $681 27 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $669 24 payments
  11. Other $2,727 114 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,110 748 payments
  2. Education $218 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $1,481 107 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $1,179 41 payments
  3. Cimzia $1,050 69 payments
  4. TALTZ $1,044 51 payments
  5. RINVOQ $892 35 payments
  6. Otezla $808 69 payments
  7. Enbrel $728 54 payments
  8. ACTHAR $681 27 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $556 23 payments
  10. Bimzelx $556 30 payments
  11. Other $7,804 359 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

5,403

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,453,206

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 112 $905,789
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 94 $713,487
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 89 $538,004
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 60 $452,277
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 37 $387,234
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 54 $307,650
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 23 $287,530
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 24 $224,333
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 54 $197,256
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 14 $192,777

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$962,394

Of which drugs: $843,291

Medicare patients

395

Average age 73

Services billed

97,954

311 women, 84 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 37%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
COPD 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 18 8,850 $291,690
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 38 3,360 $69,157
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 11 7,200 $65,082
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 47 380 $292
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 12 60 $267

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $350
$350 23 —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $314
$314 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $281
$281 37 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $225
$225 60 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $225
$225 136 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

756 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record