Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Edgar El Sayad

Internal Medicine Lomita, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1992102743 CMS profile 2790157

24845 Narbonne Ave, Lomita, CA 90717

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,652

1,425 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Edgar El Sayad of Lomita, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,652 across 1,425 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,848 173
2024 General $4,265 193
2023 General $4,355 196
2022 General $4,267 198
2021 General $4,361 204
2020 General $4,228 224
2019 General $4,328 237

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Edgar El Sayad
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Edgar El Sayad were reported at $3,848. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Edgar El Sayad Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,328 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $4,228 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,361 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $4,267 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $4,355 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $4,265 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,848 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $4,100 226 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,515 117 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $2,359 106 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,876 92 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,642 86 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,633 75 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $1,414 55 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $1,409 72 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,231 70 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,067 46 payments
  11. Other $10,407 480 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $29,387 1,419 payments
  2. Education $265 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $2,567 142 payments
  2. FARXIGA $2,012 91 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,642 100 payments
  4. XARELTO $1,642 86 payments
  5. XIFAXAN $1,254 71 payments
  6. EVENITY $1,084 47 payments
  7. Repatha $1,027 46 payments
  8. Prolia $918 40 payments
  9. Vascepa $908 42 payments
  10. Kerendia $873 38 payments
  11. Other $27,890 1,332 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 162 drugs

Part D claims

10,889

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,718,325

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 153 $236,691
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 140 $191,753
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 134 $164,234
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 139 $134,993
Prolia Denosumab Brand 82 $134,327
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 87 $104,437
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 37 $71,580
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 43 $59,187
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 43 $51,444
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 49 $42,065

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 162 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$14,464

Of which drugs: $1,130

Medicare patients

43

Average age 76

Services billed

284

25 women, 18 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 37%
Diabetes 35%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 12 12 $982
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 22 46 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LINZESS
$298 87 —
TYRVAYA
$249 — —
Ozempic
$240 153 —
JARDIANCE
$232 140 —
XIFAXAN
$231 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

1,425 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record