Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Dmitriy Ratsenberg

Internal Medicine Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1912950858 CMS profile 222438

2925 W 5Th St, Suite 52, Brooklyn, NY 11224

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,657

676 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Dmitriy Ratsenberg of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,657 across 676 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,178 57
2024 General $1,820 84
2023 General $1,745 80
2022 General $2,110 104
2021 General $2,836 145
2020 General $1,866 96
2019 General $2,102 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Dmitriy Ratsenberg
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Dmitriy Ratsenberg were reported at $1,178. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Dmitriy Ratsenberg Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,102 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,866 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,836 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,110 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,745 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,820 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,178 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,316 61 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,209 57 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $939 48 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $927 49 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $864 37 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $661 34 payments
  7. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $604 35 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $512 26 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $469 26 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $464 24 payments
  11. Other $5,693 279 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,618 673 payments
  2. Education $39 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $815 41 payments
  2. Prolia $696 33 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $661 34 payments
  4. EVENITY $653 31 payments
  5. ZENPEP $650 28 payments
  6. GEMTESA $604 35 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $591 30 payments
  8. CREON $573 30 payments
  9. FARXIGA $539 29 payments
  10. LINZESS $528 30 payments
  11. Other $12,293 607 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 301 drugs

Part D claims

33,041

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$6,002,616

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

38.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 436 $561,755
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 661 $392,775
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 325 $358,228
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 314 $331,949
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 761 $295,909
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 400 $295,483
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 366 $268,706
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 183 $249,687
Prolia Denosumab Brand 140 $237,929
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 735 $227,993

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 301 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 28 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$676,071

Of which drugs: $2,322

Medicare patients

595

Average age 77

Services billed

13,842

385 women, 210 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Heart failure 38%
Depression 36%
Osteoporosis 26%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent, 0.5 ml dosage 90658 Office 99 99 $2,121
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 33 124 $119

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
$222 178 —
ZENPEP
$208 183 —
LINZESS
$154 661 —
CREON
$144 436 —
JARDIANCE
$136 272 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

676 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record