Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Denis Becker

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Raleigh, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1750359113 CMS profile 170522

2709 Blue Ridge Rd, Suite 320, Raleigh, NC 27607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$459,299

1,333 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Denis Becker of Raleigh, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $459,299 across 1,333 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $29,350 91
2024 General $31,747 152
2023 General $43,993 149
2022 General $101,801 254
2021 General $67,683 231
2020 General $46,172 185
2019 General $138,553 271

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Denis Becker
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Denis Becker were reported at $29,350. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Denis Becker Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $138,553 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $46,172 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $67,683 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $101,801 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $43,993 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $31,747 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $29,350 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $194,366 372 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $108,728 269 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $58,536 65 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $22,795 46 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $20,098 41 payments
  6. Mannkind Corporation $19,036 121 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $16,188 28 payments
  8. Corcept Therapeutics $3,521 40 payments
  9. IBSA Pharma Inc. $3,355 18 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,319 21 payments
  11. Other $10,357 312 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $369,927 198 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $53,221 162 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $24,210 953 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $9,980 7 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,800 1 payment
  6. Education $163 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $94,462 192 payments
  2. MOUNJARO $85,439 158 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $79,590 172 payments
  4. STEGLATRO $53,486 56 payments
  5. INVOKANA $20,098 41 payments
  6. AFREZZA $15,379 104 payments
  7. SOLIQUA 100/33 $13,896 19 payments
  8. Tresiba $13,598 14 payments
  9. BAQSIMI $8,434 17 payments
  10. SYNTHROID $7,569 12 payments
  11. Other $42,605 681 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 70 drugs

Part D claims

3,801

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$1,427,293

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

50.6%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 169 $240,421
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 122 $115,238
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 65 $111,516
Afrezza Insulin Regular, Human Brand 41 $85,024
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 67 $84,801
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 31 $81,613
Prolia Denosumab Brand 31 $53,708
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5) Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/7 Brand 36 $52,290
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 65 $52,135
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 39 $43,161

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 70 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$146,630

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

601

Average age 74

Services billed

1,945

391 women, 210 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Diabetes 52%
Arthritis 46%
Osteoporosis 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
$15,937 39 —
Ozempic
$3,704 169 —
RYBELSUS
$1,012 67 —
EVENITY
$312 — —
TEPEZZA
$257 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,333 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record