Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Deborah Kim

Internal Medicine Washington, DC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679830954 CMS profile 2912174

1150 Varnum St Ne, Washington, DC 20017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,189

393 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Deborah Kim of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,189 across 393 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,108 144
2024 General $2,046 91
2023 General $1,891 93
2022 General $377 23
2021 General $17 1
2020 General $57 3
2019 General $692 38

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Deborah Kim
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Deborah Kim were reported at $3,108. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Deborah Kim Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $692 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $57 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $17 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $377 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,891 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,046 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,108 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,512 63 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,157 54 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $763 34 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $713 31 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $639 28 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $529 23 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $450 26 payments
  8. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $443 23 payments
  9. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $403 32 payments
  10. Horizon Therapeutics plc $297 16 payments
  11. Other $1,284 63 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,082 388 payments
  2. Education $107 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,465 59 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $639 28 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $529 23 payments
  4. RINVOQ $470 21 payments
  5. LUPKYNIS $443 23 payments
  6. Enbrel $343 15 payments
  7. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $324 14 payments
  8. SOVUNA $321 27 payments
  9. ILARIS $298 10 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $279 15 payments
  11. Other $3,914 201 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

797

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,674,337

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

29.7%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Krystexxa Pegloticase Brand 20 $1,230,406
Otezla Apremilast Brand 16 $127,073
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 12 $87,963
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 12 $84,507
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 19 $82,775
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 18 $43,367
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 138 $5,194
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 89 $3,190
Leflunomide Generic 40 $2,804
Lidocaine Generic 14 $1,868

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$383,015

Of which drugs: $167,394

Medicare patients

399

Average age 75

Services billed

42,152

319 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 43%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Osteoporosis 25%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Cancer 18%
Heart failure 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, preservative-free, extended-release, microsphere formulation, 1 mg J3304 Office 32 3,904 $54,029
Hyaluronan or derivative, gel-one, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7326 Office 13 25 $10,053
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 15 15 $1,227
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 130 11,763 $1,208
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 77 156 $740
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 29 46 $4

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $251
$251 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $244
$244 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $216
$216 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $197
$197 20 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $161
$161 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

393 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record