Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Wilt

Internal Medicine Kansas City, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1508857509 CMS profile 113906

1010 Carondelet Dr, Suite 224, Kansas City, MO 64114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,083

768 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Wilt of Kansas City, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,083 across 768 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $36 2
2024 General $2,060 112
2023 General $2,872 145
2022 General $2,454 150
2021 General $2,962 175
2020 General $1,438 92
2019 General $1,262 92

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Wilt
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Wilt were reported at $36. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year David Wilt Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,262 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,438 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,962 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,454 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,872 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,060 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $36 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,442 88 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,319 93 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,302 59 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,216 76 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,125 66 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $544 41 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $530 33 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $450 29 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $376 23 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $357 25 payments
  11. Other $4,421 235 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,083 768 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,021 72 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $908 61 payments
  3. FARXIGA $753 24 payments
  4. BREZTRI $637 15 payments
  5. Repatha $627 43 payments
  6. Prolia $621 35 payments
  7. EVENITY $577 32 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $575 38 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $523 30 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $514 25 payments
  11. Other $11,360 687 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 168 drugs

Part D claims

11,902

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$976,370

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 96 $111,874
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 95 $93,603
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 102 $91,722
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 83 $74,714
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 57 $72,128
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 45 $60,412
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 64 $56,897
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 30 $42,052
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 62 $34,683
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 22 $30,986

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 168 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$74,717

Of which drugs: $31,324

Medicare patients

366

Average age 76

Services billed

4,212

161 women, 205 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
COPD 14%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 15 1,260 $24,800
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 35 102 $66

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 42 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $199
$199 96 —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $97
$97 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $95
$95 22 —
INJECTAFER
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $87
$87 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $78
$78 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 42 with Patron

Records

768 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record