Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Tsong

Internal Medicine Huntington Beach, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1942228739 CMS profile 360895

17822 Beach Blvd Ste 352, Huntington Beach, CA 92647

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,399

359 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Tsong of Huntington Beach, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,399 across 359 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,753 57
2024 General $5,542 73
2023 General $3,552 50
2022 General $1,928 42
2021 General $1,663 49
2020 General $1,021 49
2019 General $941 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Tsong
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Tsong were reported at $3,753. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year David Tsong Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $941 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,021 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,663 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,928 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,552 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $5,542 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,753 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,952 101 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,310 35 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,254 64 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $948 21 payments
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $751 6 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $750 21 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $490 11 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $486 8 payments
  9. Insulet Corporation $440 3 payments
  10. CeQur Corporation $438 4 payments
  11. Other $4,581 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,399 359 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $2,271 57 payments
  2. BREZTRI $2,134 24 payments
  3. EVENITY $1,409 27 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $758 40 payments
  5. AREXVY $736 8 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $718 15 payments
  7. Prolia $500 18 payments
  8. Omnipod $440 3 payments
  9. CeQur Simplicity $438 4 payments
  10. XARELTO $425 7 payments
  11. Other $9,154 205 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 119 drugs

Part D claims

7,427

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$557,993

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

15.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 77 $92,258
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 94 $87,596
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 52 $70,310
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 30 $48,338
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 15 $32,713
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 14 $24,556
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 24 $22,663
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 23 $17,342
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 13 $12,987
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 15 $10,733

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 119 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$129,891

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

261

Average age 78

Services billed

1,447

147 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Arthritis 37%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $647
$647 77 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $604
$604 15 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $494
$494 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $364
$364 — —
FANAPT
  • Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. $250
$250 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

359 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record