Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Gu

Internal Medicine Alhambra, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1225107006 CMS profile 236609

723 S Garfield Ave, Suite 201, Alhambra, CA 91801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$34,991

557 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Gu of Alhambra, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $34,991 across 557 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $743 28
2024 General $5,292 54
2023 General $5,214 93
2022 General $6,314 82
2021 General $6,987 97
2020 General $2,982 74
2019 General $7,459 129

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Gu
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Gu were reported at $743. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year David Gu Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $7,459 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,982 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $6,987 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $6,314 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $5,214 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $5,292 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $743 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $22,856 74 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,860 85 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,730 74 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $987 33 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $737 28 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $635 24 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $550 26 payments
  8. CMP Pharma, Inc. $521 8 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $518 24 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $458 18 payments
  11. Other $4,139 163 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $21,900 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $13,003 535 payments
  3. Education $89 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Vemlidy $17,181 20 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,417 66 payments
  3. CREON $1,135 49 payments
  4. LINZESS $1,018 43 payments
  5. Kerendia $737 28 payments
  6. Prolia $638 21 payments
  7. CaroSpir $521 8 payments
  8. VERQUVO $472 20 payments
  9. BELSOMRA $433 20 payments
  10. STEGLATRO $417 21 payments
  11. Other $8,759 368 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 262 drugs

Part D claims

22,603

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,360,421

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 175 $221,635
Prolia Denosumab Brand 116 $193,802
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 236 $187,510
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 348 $146,712
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 162 $117,641
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 141 $99,032
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 59 $88,821
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 132 $85,900
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 45 $69,331
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 170 $69,164

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 262 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$189,923

Of which drugs: $4,448

Medicare patients

334

Average age 76

Services billed

3,050

208 women, 126 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 50%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Osteoporosis 41%
Arthritis 38%
Alzheimer's or dementia 31%
Depression 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 26 26 $2,127
Vaccine for pneumococcal polysaccharide for injection beneath the skin or into muscle, patient 2 years or older 90732 Office 12 12 $1,570
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 24 24 $526
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 19 30 $28

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Vemlidy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $4,107
$4,107 45 —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $204
$204 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $172
$172 18 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $123
$123 162 —
LINZESS
  • AbbVie, Inc. $75
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $48
$123 92 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

557 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record