Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Goldenberg

Ophthalmology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1417170432 CMS profile 336255

1101 E Missouri Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85014

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,641

95 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, David Goldenberg of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,641 across 95 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $813 22
2024 General $1,463 29
2023 General $1,203 15
2022 General $995 13
2021 General $867 10
2020 General $123 2
2019 General $178 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Goldenberg
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Goldenberg were reported at $813. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year David Goldenberg Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $178 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $123 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $867 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $995 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,203 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,463 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $813 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $2,070 10 payments
  2. Glaukos Corporation $774 7 payments
  3. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $436 15 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $419 15 payments
  5. Alcon Vision LLC $381 7 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $346 14 payments
  7. RxSight Inc $239 2 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $199 6 payments
  9. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $165 3 payments
  10. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $150 1 payment
  11. Other $460 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,641 95 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $1,474 8 payments
  2. YUTIQ $596 2 payments
  3. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $596 2 payments
  4. KXL System $435 4 payments
  5. Photrexa $435 4 payments
  6. iStent inject W $435 4 payments
  7. EYLEA HD $342 12 payments
  8. EYLEA $332 12 payments
  9. VABYSMO $240 9 payments
  10. RXSIGHT CONTACT LENS $239 2 payments
  11. Other $3,251 69 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 7 drugs

Part D claims

837

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$19,038

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 379 $10,287
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 186 $4,403
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 145 $3,150
Timolol Maleate Generic 67 $375
Ofloxacin Generic 32 $365
Dorzolamide Hcl Generic 13 $319
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 15 $139

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,521,090

Of which drugs: $4,669,754

Medicare patients

1,860

Average age 79

Services billed

81,102

1,083 women, 777 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 376 2,822 $1,857,361
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 249 59,460 $1,631,475
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 94 2,160 $568,617
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 93 1,776 $230,244
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 25 1,335 $156,555
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 47 670 $125,536
Injection, avacincaptad pegol, 0.1 mg J2782 Office 22 820 $70,586
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 81 $59

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $298
$298 — —
XIPERE
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $97
$97 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $93
$93 — 59,460
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $72
$72 — 2,160
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58
$58 — 1,335

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

95 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record