Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Daniel Choi

Ophthalmology Stockton, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1801164827 CMS profile 1711042

36 W Yokuts Ave, Suite 1, Stockton, CA 95207

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,786

150 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,419 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Daniel Choi of Stockton, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,786 across 150 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,419 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,422 26
2024 General $712 24
2023 General $1,311 18
2022 General $258 12
2021 General $228 18
2020 General $266 19
2019 General $589 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Daniel Choi
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Daniel Choi were reported at $5,422. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Daniel Choi Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $589 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $266 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $228 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $258 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,311 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $712 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $5,422 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RxSight Inc $4,965 12 payments
  2. Glaukos Corporation $825 1 payment
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $584 19 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $464 40 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $457 25 payments
  6. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $297 20 payments
  7. DePuy Synthes Sales Inc. $207 3 payments
  8. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $130 1 payment
  9. Dompe US, Inc. $100 1 payment
  10. Nova Eye, Inc. $94 1 payment
  11. Other $664 27 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $5,400 3 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $3,332 144 payments
  3. Education $37 2 payments
  4. Gift $17 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RXSIGHT LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE (LDD) $4,965 12 payments
  2. RXSIGHT CONTACT LENS $4,965 12 payments
  3. RXSIGHT INJECTOR CARTRIDGE $4,965 12 payments
  4. RXSIGHT INJECTOR HANDPIECE $4,965 12 payments
  5. LIGHT ADJUSTABLE LENS (LAL) $4,919 10 payments
  6. KXL system (not refurbished) $825 1 payment
  7. LUMIGAN Eye Care $360 21 payments
  8. Rhopressa $228 16 payments
  9. Rocklatan $178 7 payments
  10. LUMIGAN Ophthalmology $162 17 payments
  11. Other $2,670 106 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

11,215

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$1,015,535

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

32.6%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 655 $297,764
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 413 $201,221
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 83 $80,984
Latanoprost Generic 3,187 $49,711
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 100 $43,067
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 195 $38,382
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 1,767 $35,741
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 1,393 $35,539
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 81 $35,321
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 976 $32,074

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$443,065

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,173

Average age 76

Services billed

4,940

686 women, 487 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 37%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Heart failure 15%
Depression 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $119
$119 413 —
IYUZEH
  • Thea Pharma Inc. $44
$44 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $32
$32 — —
TYRVAYA
  • Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $26
$26 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $25
$25 100 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

150 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record