Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Dal Chun

Retina Specialist Vienna, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1578587135 CMS profile 25442

8219 Leesburg Pike, #120, Vienna, VA 22182

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,309

109 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$17,501 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Dal Chun of Vienna, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,309 across 109 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $17,501 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $10,112 33
2024 General $552 17
2023 General $593 17
2022 General $284 13
2021 General $358 13
2020 General $217 6
2019 General $193 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Dal Chun
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Dal Chun were reported at $10,112. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Dal Chun Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $193 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $217 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $358 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $284 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $593 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $552 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $10,112 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $9,611 17 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma US Inc $377 11 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $369 11 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $355 15 payments
  5. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $293 10 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $262 8 payments
  7. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $243 5 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $238 13 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $125 5 payments
  10. Alcon Vision LLC $120 1 payment
  11. Other $316 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $8,460 3 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,995 100 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $854 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYLEA HD $9,853 24 payments
  2. OZURDEX Eye Care $319 13 payments
  3. VABYSMO $312 9 payments
  4. Izervay $311 8 payments
  5. ILUVIEN $293 10 payments
  6. OZURDEX Retina $275 15 payments
  7. Syfovre $243 5 payments
  8. BEOVU $125 5 payments
  9. ReSTOR $120 1 payment
  10. XIPERE $84 4 payments
  11. Other $385 16 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 7 drugs

Part D claims

277

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$7,835

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

5.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 68 $2,961
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 94 $2,718
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 35 $1,159
Latanoprost Generic 19 $348
Timolol Maleate Generic 18 $254
Ofloxacin Generic 28 $234
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 15 $162

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,291,918

Of which drugs: $2,323,709

Medicare patients

1,256

Average age 77

Services billed

34,714

698 women, 558 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Osteoporosis 17%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Cancer 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 146 5,200 $1,374,959
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 78 15,840 $436,325
Injection, avacincaptad pegol, 0.1 mg J2782 Office 23 2,620 $226,498
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 67 322 $213,247

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $218
$218 — 2,620
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $118
$118 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $67
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26
$93 — 5,200
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $55
$55 — 15,840
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $34
$34 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

109 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record