Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Craig Deligdish

Hematology & Oncology Melbourne, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1679564462 CMS profile 30699

1344 S Apollo Blvd, Ste 303, Melbourne, FL 32901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,203

127 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,646

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$99,201 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2022

Through program year 2025, Craig Deligdish of Melbourne, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,203 across 127 general payments and $1,646 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $99,201 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 59th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,055 43
2024 General $1,456 50
2023 General $512 24
2022 General $42 2
2021 General $58 3
2021 Research $1,646 2
2020 General $14 1
2019 General $66 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Craig Deligdish
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Craig Deligdish were reported at $1,055. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Craig Deligdish Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $66 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $14 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $58 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $42 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $512 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $1,456 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $1,055 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Astellas Pharma US Inc $289 8 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $260 11 payments
  3. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $252 8 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $248 4 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $239 12 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $219 10 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $148 7 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $127 4 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $125 6 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $119 6 payments
  11. Other $1,176 51 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,721 121 payments
  2. Education $482 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XTANDI $226 12 payments
  2. EVENITY $148 7 payments
  3. ENHERTU $138 6 payments
  4. Trodelvy $126 5 payments
  5. TALZENNA $109 5 payments
  6. REBLOZYL $105 3 payments
  7. MONJUVI $101 4 payments
  8. Prolia $101 5 payments
  9. BRUKINSA $92 5 payments
  10. INLYTA $91 4 payments
  11. Other $2,231 101 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $1,646 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 4 drugs

Part D claims

65

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$215,285

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

38.5%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 12 $197,196
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 13 $17,103
Hydroxyurea Generic 14 $549
Anastrozole Generic 26 $437

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 68 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$914,448

Of which drugs: $771,898

Medicare patients

363

Average age 74

Services billed

62,625

249 women, 114 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 64%
Osteoporosis 58%
Cancer 29%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 22 19,950 $170,461
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 95 7,740 $158,955
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 18 104 $14,538

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $86
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $44
$131 — —
XTANDI
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $65
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$81 — —
BRUKINSA
  • BeiGene USA, Inc. $57
$57 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $51
$51 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $50
$50 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

129 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record