Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Collin Vu

Internal Medicine Fountain Valley, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1225244775 CMS profile 55308

9900 Talbert Ave Ste 103A, Fountain Valley, CA 92708

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,904

720 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Collin Vu of Fountain Valley, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,904 across 720 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,468 137
2024 General $3,189 124
2023 General $3,109 140
2022 General $3,214 140
2021 General $2,587 107
2020 General $470 22
2019 General $867 50

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Collin Vu
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Collin Vu were reported at $3,468. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Collin Vu Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $867 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $470 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,587 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,214 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,109 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,189 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,468 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,345 66 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $964 47 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $933 36 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $803 47 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $747 35 payments
  6. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $719 33 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $684 25 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $560 12 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $556 18 payments
  10. Eisai Inc. $540 25 payments
  11. Other $9,053 376 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,056 706 payments
  2. Education $847 14 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $883 34 payments
  2. IMBRUVICA $816 37 payments
  3. LIBTAYO $603 14 payments
  4. Lenvima $540 25 payments
  5. OPDIVO $493 28 payments
  6. KISQALI $437 20 payments
  7. ENHERTU $352 15 payments
  8. ERLEADA $309 12 payments
  9. REBLOZYL $296 14 payments
  10. Nubeqa $290 12 payments
  11. Other $15,269 685 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

1,422

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$6,187,840

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

50.5%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 48 $812,012
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 36 $546,491
Keytruda Pembrolizumab Brand 39 $434,707
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 17 $413,091
Nubeqa Darolutamide Brand 30 $377,585
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Brand 24 $340,464
Lenalidomide Generic 21 $328,026
Reblozyl Luspatercept-Aamt Brand 25 $311,450
Lupron Depot Leuprolide Acetate Brand 53 $297,544
Sprycel Dasatinib Brand 21 $281,124

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 99 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,629,967

Of which drugs: $2,204,657

Medicare patients

648

Average age 76

Services billed

141,089

374 women, 274 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 60%
Chronic kidney disease 56%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Cancer 40%
Heart failure 34%
COPD 31%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 16 5,940 $122,927
Injection, leucovorin calcium, per 50 mg J0640 Office 11 632 $2,251
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 12 515 $1,222
Injection, oxaliplatin, 0.5 mg J9263 Office 14 19,400 $1,075
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 37 4,532 $409
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 23 127 $263
Injection, ondansetron hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2405 Office 27 1,776 $131
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 23 138 $89
Injection, heparin sodium, (heparin lock flush), per 10 units J1642 Office 13 1,500 $16

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 67 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
$195 39 —
ENHERTU
$109 — —
Fabhalta
$102 — —
KISQALI
$101 12 —
LIBTAYO
$99 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 67 with Patron

Records

720 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record