Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Clayton Adams

Interventional Pain Medicine Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1699069104 CMS profile 76918

7307 Creekbluff Dr, Austin, TX 78750

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,938

935 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Clayton Adams of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,938 across 935 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,488 43
2024 General $4,464 99
2023 General $3,036 105
2022 General $5,895 388
2021 General $3,449 211
2020 General $1,809 62
2019 General $798 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Clayton Adams
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Clayton Adams were reported at $2,488. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Clayton Adams Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $798 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $1,809 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $3,449 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $5,895 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $3,036 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $4,464 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $2,488 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $16,475 770 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,794 35 payments
  3. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $1,059 9 payments
  4. Nalu Medical, Inc. $352 4 payments
  5. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $269 15 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $247 22 payments
  7. Nevro Corp. $189 3 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $163 9 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $141 10 payments
  10. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $138 1 payment
  11. Other $1,112 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,314 932 payments
  2. Honoraria $1,000 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $623 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OCTRODE Neuromodulation $5,722 183 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $4,901 262 payments
  3. Proclaim IPG $2,386 135 payments
  4. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $1,278 17 payments
  5. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $427 43 payments
  6. OCTRODE Structural Heart $377 5 payments
  7. Nalu Neurostimulation System $352 4 payments
  8. Octrode SCS Leads $336 33 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $263 15 payments
  10. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $261 3 payments
  11. Other $4,771 241 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 50 drugs

Part D claims

5,668

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$309,126

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

57.6%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,915 $59,948
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 46 $33,229
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 83 $31,777
Hysingla Er Hydrocodone Bitartrate Brand 55 $25,820
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 53 $24,020
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 14 $15,877
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 578 $14,141
Buprenorphine Generic 41 $13,204
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 11 $11,939
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 327 $11,469

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 50 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 78 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$198,049

Of which drugs: $625

Medicare patients

377

Average age 71

Services billed

2,519

233 women, 144 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 38%
Depression 37%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Heart failure 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 27 362 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $21
$21 46 —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 11 —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $19
$19 53 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

935 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record