Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chin Kim

Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine Anaheim, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1477564607 CMS profile 203110

1736 W Medical Center Dr, Suite B, Anaheim, CA 92801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,132

354 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chin Kim of Anaheim, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,132 across 354 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,261 64
2024 General $1,203 53
2023 General $766 50
2022 General $987 56
2021 General $1,460 73
2020 General $568 30
2019 General $888 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chin Kim
  • Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chin Kim were reported at $1,261. Among 69 Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $125 and the middle half received between $37 and $473.

Show as a table
Year Chin Kim Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $888 $152 $43–$474 $163
2020 $568 $113 $31–$725 $114
2021 $1,460 $167 $50–$469 $132
2022 $987 $132 $46–$572 $149
2023 $766 $109 $39–$366 $160
2024 $1,203 $115 $37–$321 $164
2025 $1,261 $125 $37–$473 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,442 201 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $679 39 payments
  3. Exact Sciences Corporation $334 14 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $315 8 payments
  5. Radius Health, Inc. $302 9 payments
  6. Bioventus LLC $255 12 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $239 2 payments
  8. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $237 13 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $163 8 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $149 3 payments
  11. Other $1,016 45 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,132 354 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EVENITY $1,493 88 payments
  2. Repatha Cardiology $1,384 86 payments
  3. Otezla $1,235 98 payments
  4. Prolia $1,175 77 payments
  5. Ozempic $474 33 payments
  6. REPATHA Cardiovascular $420 24 payments
  7. ZENPEP $371 20 payments
  8. Cologuard Collection Kit $334 14 payments
  9. FARXIGA $315 8 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $292 15 payments
  11. Other $2,406 109 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 159 drugs

Part D claims

9,493

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$902,086

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 152 $104,856
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 121 $94,382
Prolia Denosumab Brand 56 $93,973
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 53 $73,077
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 57 $60,078
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 185 $52,601
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 73 $46,984
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $35,938
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 57 $35,591
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 46 $33,466

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 159 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$731,196

Of which drugs: $178,965

Medicare patients

924

Average age 80

Services billed

17,001

600 women, 324 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 74%
Diabetes 50%
Osteoporosis 35%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Heart failure 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 303 2,431 $140,194
Hyaluronan or derivative, trivisc, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7329 Office 63 6,575 $37,608
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 24 24 $867
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 37 80 $37
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 19 72 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $255
$255 46 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $250
$250 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $176
$176 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $66
$66 19 —
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $61
$61 56 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

354 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record