Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Charles King

Rheumatology Tupelo, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1538137989 CMS profile 69599

845 S Madison St, Tupelo, MS 38801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,288

235 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$789

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$390,912 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Charles King of Tupelo, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,288 across 235 general payments and $789 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $390,912 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 77th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $248 13
2024 General $634 32
2023 General $552 37
2022 General $775 36
2021 General $5,440 46
2020 General $5,184 41
2019 General $455 30
2019 Research $789 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Charles King
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Charles King were reported at $248. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Charles King Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $455 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $5,184 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $5,440 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $775 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $552 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $634 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $248 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $9,380 20 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,921 99 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $571 52 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $259 12 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $245 13 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $204 14 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $158 2 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $100 1 payment
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $87 2 payments
  10. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $66 3 payments
  11. Other $296 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $9,100 2 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $4,170 232 payments
  3. Education $18 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,247 70 payments
  2. HUMIRA $403 18 payments
  3. XELJANZ $277 17 payments
  4. Enbrel $264 24 payments
  5. Otezla $259 25 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $259 12 payments
  7. ORENCIA $204 14 payments
  8. PROCLAIM $158 2 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $158 4 payments
  10. COSENTYX $127 7 payments
  11. Other $1,347 84 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $789 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 55 drugs

Part D claims

12,261

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$17,776,924

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

38.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 744 $5,069,969
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 311 $2,298,128
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 275 $2,131,287
Humira Adalimumab Brand 213 $1,446,992
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 176 $1,099,293
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 156 $867,011
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 172 $666,831
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 68 $569,274
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 24 $462,703
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 75 $451,463

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 55 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$320,240

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,894

Average age 73

Services billed

6,608

1,411 women, 483 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 40%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 22%
Depression 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $155
$155 176 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $95
$95 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $88
$88 24 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $77
$77 19 —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $66
$66 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

236 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record