Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Chad Prior

Internal Medicine Green Valley, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1790772036 CMS profile 613400

1055 N. La Canada Blvd, Suite 121, Green Valley, AZ 85614

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,333

586 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Chad Prior of Green Valley, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,333 across 586 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,180 79
2024 General $1,562 94
2023 General $1,196 68
2022 General $1,522 91
2021 General $1,528 96
2020 General $1,053 69
2019 General $1,291 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Chad Prior
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Chad Prior were reported at $1,180. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Chad Prior Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,291 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,053 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,528 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,522 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,196 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,562 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,180 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,419 94 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,415 95 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $826 64 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $601 32 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $558 30 payments
  6. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $472 28 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $358 22 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $321 19 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $319 24 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $291 19 payments
  11. Other $2,752 159 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,333 586 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,163 77 payments
  2. EVENITY $660 45 payments
  3. Ozempic $660 50 payments
  4. Repatha $646 36 payments
  5. GEMTESA $618 35 payments
  6. Prolia $614 41 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $587 44 payments
  8. Otezla $535 35 payments
  9. FARXIGA $319 14 payments
  10. XARELTO $291 19 payments
  11. Other $7,196 448 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 178 drugs

Part D claims

15,619

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,542,633

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 163 $253,609
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 114 $128,049
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 85 $121,598
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 69 $113,372
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 76 $109,087
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 42 $70,138
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 54 $70,054
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 28 $56,658
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 29 $56,520
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 55 $52,329

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 178 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 155 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$494,956

Of which drugs: $97,519

Medicare patients

1,175

Average age 78

Services billed

16,636

553 women, 622 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Diabetes 19%
Depression 19%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 32 2,880 $58,779
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 91 91 $26,395
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 150 150 $12,273
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 109 $72

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $176
$176 114 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $147
$147 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $143
$143 45 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $96
$96 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $80
$80 69 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

586 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record