Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Celine Rivera

Internal Medicine Ogden, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1407052772 CMS profile 335362

5405 S 500 E Ste 203, Ogden, UT 84405

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,494

672 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Celine Rivera of Ogden, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,494 across 672 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,313 92
2024 General $1,831 102
2023 General $1,648 100
2022 General $1,118 71
2021 General $3,071 149
2020 General $1,813 111
2019 General $699 47

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Celine Rivera
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Celine Rivera were reported at $1,313. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Celine Rivera Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $699 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,813 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,071 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,118 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,648 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,831 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,313 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,234 87 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $750 1 payment
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $732 43 payments
  4. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $714 23 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $703 40 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $654 46 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $620 45 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $590 43 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $518 29 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $504 30 payments
  11. Other $4,476 285 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,744 671 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $750 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $815 5 payments
  2. Otezla $680 52 payments
  3. Repatha $662 46 payments
  4. Veozah $518 28 payments
  5. Vascepa $453 42 payments
  6. INJECTAFER $396 17 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $390 25 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $349 19 payments
  9. Ozempic $323 24 payments
  10. TRADJENTA $302 16 payments
  11. Other $10,579 670 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

4,338

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$432,512

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 74 $87,472
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 73 $86,763
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 48 $50,544
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 44 $41,786
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 21 $29,973
Prolia Denosumab Brand 12 $20,884
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 17 $16,926
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 15 $16,419
Sunosi Solriamfetol Hcl Brand 11 $9,306
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 13 $8,168

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$75,420

Of which drugs: $8,881

Medicare patients

162

Average age 76

Services billed

1,118

134 women, 28 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 49%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Diabetes 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Cancer 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 40 40 $3,273
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 21 21 $2,983

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $272
$272 — —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $80
  • Lundbeck LLC $42
$122 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $104
$104 — —
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $89
$89 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $88
$88 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

672 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record