Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Celinde Strohl

Internal Medicine Littleton, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1912990409 CMS profile 313417

7780 S Broadway, Suite 100, Littleton, CO 80122

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,241

804 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Celinde Strohl of Littleton, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,241 across 804 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,406 84
2024 General $2,259 117
2023 General $2,107 101
2022 General $2,319 126
2021 General $2,471 151
2020 General $1,739 108
2019 General $1,940 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Celinde Strohl
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Celinde Strohl were reported at $1,406. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Celinde Strohl Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,940 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,739 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,471 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,319 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,107 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,259 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,406 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,833 108 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,589 84 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,077 41 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,013 56 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $988 70 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $618 38 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $562 38 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $429 24 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $418 26 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $404 20 payments
  11. Other $5,312 299 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,209 802 payments
  2. Gift $18 1 payment
  3. Education $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $782 44 payments
  2. Repatha $611 42 payments
  3. Otezla $581 48 payments
  4. AIMOVIG $553 22 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $490 30 payments
  6. EVENITY $443 19 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $438 20 payments
  8. XARELTO $418 26 payments
  9. Ozempic $406 25 payments
  10. Prolia $379 15 payments
  11. Other $14,162 822 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 167 drugs

Part D claims

11,630

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,075,957

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 160 $151,666
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 64 $85,155
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 61 $83,310
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 86 $75,193
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 46 $50,391
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 18 $47,455
Prolia Denosumab Brand 26 $46,128
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 39 $44,578
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 35 $35,785
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 34 $35,376

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 167 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 64 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$161,857

Of which drugs: $45,028

Medicare patients

353

Average age 75

Services billed

2,573

260 women, 93 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 44%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Depression 34%
Osteoporosis 33%
Cancer 20%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Diabetes 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 83 83 $24,151
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 107 107 $8,705
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 56 56 $8,556

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $181
$181 — —
LOKELMA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $154
$154 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $115
$115 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $110
$110 11 —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $89
$89 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

804 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record