Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Cayla Mays

Nurse Practitioner Muncie, IN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1255099503 CMS profile 11272524

1107 S Tillotson Ave, Muncie, IN 47304

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,026

401 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Cayla Mays of Muncie, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,026 across 401 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,989 118
2024 General $1,753 113
2023 General $2,175 117
2022 General $1,109 53

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Cayla Mays
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Cayla Mays were reported at $1,989. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Cayla Mays Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $0 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,109 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,175 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,753 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,989 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,161 82 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,011 31 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $885 56 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $589 28 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $548 31 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $541 36 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $470 32 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $345 28 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $290 18 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $226 12 payments
  11. Other $960 47 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,454 391 payments
  2. Education $572 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,011 31 payments
  2. RINVOQ $679 49 payments
  3. ACTHAR $589 28 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $548 31 payments
  5. COSENTYX $407 28 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $369 25 payments
  7. XELJANZ $345 28 payments
  8. Otezla $301 21 payments
  9. Enbrel $297 21 payments
  10. TALTZ $290 18 payments
  11. Other $2,691 160 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

4,162

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$4,120,619

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

29.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 117 $839,229
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 131 $728,698
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 80 $581,286
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 19 $397,944
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 56 $280,105
Cosentyx Sensoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 26 $192,769
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 26 $176,607
Otezla Apremilast Brand 30 $156,670
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 25 $142,644
Simponi Golimumab Brand 20 $129,788

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$604,614

Of which drugs: $556,768

Medicare patients

316

Average age 70

Services billed

40,422

250 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 39%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Osteoporosis 30%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 39 11,250 $375,153
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 22 8,205 $72,803
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 15 16,400 $59,663

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $337
$337 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $169
$169 19 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $163
$163 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $124
$124 26 —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $110
$110 25 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

401 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record