Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Catherine Coombs

Hematology & Oncology Orange, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1417273517 CMS profile 1393736

101 The City Dr S, Orange, CA 92868

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$786,467

695 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$7,775

Paid to them · 25 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,098,681 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Catherine Coombs of Orange, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $786,467 across 695 general payments and $7,775 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,098,681 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $206,075 157
2025 Research $2,175 1
2024 General $258,416 215
2023 General $229,013 221
2023 Research $3,383 16
2022 General $42,060 37
2022 Research $2,217 8
2021 General $25,357 19
2020 General $12,685 10
2019 General $12,862 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Catherine Coombs
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Catherine Coombs were reported at $206,075. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Catherine Coombs Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $12,862 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $12,685 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $25,357 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $42,060 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $229,013 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $258,416 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $206,075 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $179,716 164 payments
  2. BeiGene USA, Inc. $158,492 117 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $135,887 73 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $117,419 141 payments
  5. BeOne Medicines USA, Inc. $82,793 59 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $46,317 54 payments
  7. Eli Lilly and Company $32,319 40 payments
  8. Genentech, Inc. $7,367 5 payments
  9. Janssen Global Services, LLC $7,050 1 payment
  10. AstraZeneca UK Limited $4,227 4 payments
  11. Other $14,879 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $433,193 121 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $265,368 104 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $66,816 213 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $17,190 254 payments
  5. Honoraria $3,900 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BRUKINSA $238,495 173 payments
  2. CALQUENCE $169,562 138 payments
  3. JAYPIRCA $113,459 67 payments
  4. VENCLEXTA Oncology $77,868 94 payments
  5. VENCLEXTA BioOncology $47,980 54 payments
  6. Venclexta Virology $5,774 16 payments
  7. LUNSUMIO $5,098 8 payments
  8. EPKINLY $4,810 13 payments
  9. OCTAGAM IMMUNE GLOBULIN (HUMAN) $4,166 7 payments
  10. GAZYVA $3,551 8 payments
  11. Other $12,792 34 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Octapharma USA, Inc. $5,600 24 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,175 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 4 drugs

Part D claims

75

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$460,458

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

42.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 32 $459,875
Acyclovir Generic 18 $459
Allopurinol Generic 11 $76
Prednisone Generic 14 $47

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$43,961

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

124

Average age 74

Services billed

423

63 women, 61 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 35%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Depression 24%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Heart failure 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BRUKINSA
$76,491 — —
CALQUENCE
$54,021 32 —
JAYPIRCA
$43,838 — —
VENCLEXTA
$38,214 — —
EPKINLY
$4,604 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

720 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record