Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Carroll Pinner

Family Medicine Peak, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1275515108 CMS profile 193994

32 River St, Peak, SC 29122

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,317

1,285 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Carroll Pinner of Peak, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,317 across 1,285 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,840 161
2024 General $2,483 156
2023 General $2,852 181
2022 General $2,983 198
2021 General $3,389 234
2020 General $2,682 179
2019 General $3,087 176

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Carroll Pinner
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Carroll Pinner were reported at $2,840. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Carroll Pinner Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,087 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,682 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,389 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,983 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,852 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,483 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,840 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,794 84 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,729 122 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,604 151 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,518 82 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $929 71 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $813 35 payments
  7. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $788 56 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $757 49 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $754 54 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $744 49 payments
  11. Other $8,888 532 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,051 1,276 payments
  2. Education $212 8 payments
  3. Gift $53 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,311 93 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,183 46 payments
  3. XIFAXAN $940 61 payments
  4. Kerendia $813 35 payments
  5. Prolia $773 43 payments
  6. BREZTRI $764 29 payments
  7. VRAYLAR $763 78 payments
  8. REXULTI $729 42 payments
  9. Repatha $697 39 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $678 59 payments
  11. Other $18,092 1,180 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 261 drugs

Part D claims

26,041

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$5,208,288

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

29.3%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Korlym Mifepristone Brand 32 $1,563,380
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 557 $621,891
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 388 $338,801
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 283 $233,387
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 183 $215,084
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 176 $141,097
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 100 $123,200
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 152 $118,093
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 73 $116,512
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 137 $110,477

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 261 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 150 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$386,429

Of which drugs: $98,471

Medicare patients

581

Average age 76

Services billed

26,529

280 women, 301 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 41%
Arthritis 41%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 80 80 $23,017
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 257 260 $21,112
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 110 110 $16,806
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 13 13 $1,859
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 90 498 $315
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 11 44 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 46 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
$324 33 —
GEMTESA
$163 — —
FARXIGA
$152 176 —
AIRSUPRA
$141 — —
MOUNJARO
$130 183 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 46 with Patron

Records

1,285 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record