Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brock Bakewell

Ophthalmology Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1487791547 CMS profile 249333

5599 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85704

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,952

156 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$12,496 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Brock Bakewell of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,952 across 156 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $12,496 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,427 26
2024 General $726 17
2023 General $1,057 20
2022 General $479 10
2021 General $662 32
2020 General $663 26
2019 General $939 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brock Bakewell
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brock Bakewell were reported at $7,427. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Brock Bakewell Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $939 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $663 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $662 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $479 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,057 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $726 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $7,427 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $6,680 13 payments
  2. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $1,508 43 payments
  3. RxSight Inc $786 10 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $704 35 payments
  5. Alcon Vision LLC $441 7 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $184 5 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $168 2 payments
  8. Sight Sciences, Inc. $160 2 payments
  9. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $155 3 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $151 7 payments
  11. Other $1,015 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,051 149 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $5,200 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $577 2 payments
  4. Education $85 3 payments
  5. Honoraria $39 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travoprost Intraocular Implant - iDose $6,035 4 payments
  2. VERITAS Vision System $715 11 payments
  3. RXSIGHT LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE (LDD) $553 8 payments
  4. RXSIGHT CONTACT LENS $553 8 payments
  5. RXSIGHT INJECTOR CARTRIDGE $553 8 payments
  6. RXSIGHT INJECTOR HANDPIECE $553 8 payments
  7. LIGHT ADJUSTABLE LENS (LAL) $386 6 payments
  8. iDoseTR $273 5 payments
  9. LIGHT ADJUSTABLE LENS (LAL) AND LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE (LDD) $232 2 payments
  10. Tecnis IOL $226 8 payments
  11. Other $4,716 141 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

654

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$54,057

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

19.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 13 $23,024
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 41 $19,577
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 109 $3,768
Latanoprost Generic 306 $2,753
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 22 $2,058
Fluorometholone Generic 12 $807
Acetazolamide Generic 13 $626
Timolol Maleate Generic 68 $598
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 19 $372
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 23 $330

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$153,626

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

574

Average age 76

Services billed

1,426

338 women, 236 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 47%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Depression 19%
Diabetes 16%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $14
$14 41 —
IHEEZO
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $5
$5 — —
TOBRADEX ST
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $5
$5 — —
FLAREX
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $5
$5 — —
VERKAZIA
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $5
$5 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

156 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record